Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove POSIX-specific headers #1156

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2024
Merged

Remove POSIX-specific headers #1156

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2024

Conversation

JCGoran
Copy link
Contributor

@JCGoran JCGoran commented Feb 15, 2024

We don't seem to use them anywhere, and it could be a good step towards implementing #1112

@JCGoran JCGoran marked this pull request as ready for review February 15, 2024 14:39
@alkino alkino enabled auto-merge (squash) February 15, 2024 14:41
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (0b39872) 88.38% compared to head (1dabeb9) 88.38%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1156   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.38%   88.38%           
=======================================
  Files         176      176           
  Lines       12946    12946           
=======================================
  Hits        11442    11442           
  Misses       1504     1504           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bbpbuildbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #193562 (:white_check_mark:) have been uploaded here!

Status and direct links:

@alkino alkino merged commit 778e81e into master Feb 15, 2024
20 checks passed
@alkino alkino deleted the jelic/remove_posix branch February 15, 2024 14:49
ohm314 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants