Compiling under CMSSW_5_3_X broken since commit 7ece9bf8 #4
Comments
|
Hi all! There are also compilation errors for the CMSSW_7 receipt (see below). Without looking who made the last commit can this be fixed by the guilty one, please!? ;-) Thanks and cheers, Arno [lxplus0056] ~/scratch1/CMSSW_7_0_7_patch1/src $ scramv1 b -j8
On 01.12.2014, at 05:21, Frank Meier <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote: I tried to test the instructions on https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/Bmm4HowtoAnalyze and did so in CMSSW_5_3_22_patch1, what I found to be the latest available release on t3.unl.eduhttp://t3.unl.edu. Unfortunately the last command scramv1 b -j8 failed with output as follows: ----- snip ----
With git blame HFDumpUtilities.cchttp://HFDumpUtilities.cc I identified commit 7ece9bfhttps://github.com/Bmm4/Bmm/commit/7ece9bf83051ef08424fa66e121d2a440e68018c as culprit. Reverting it using git revert 7ece9bf Did the trick. I did not commit such a change, I only did it locally to test. � |
|
Hi all, without checking I think that CMSSW_7_3_0_preX should compile. It seems to Cheers, On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:38 AM, heistera notifications@github.com wrote:
|
|
Arno, Frank, Best regards, Danek Bohdan Kotlinski On 1 Dec 2014, at 09:38, Arno Heister Arno.Heister@cern.ch wrote:
|
|
Hi Urs! Yes, CMSSW_7_3_0_pre3 works. I have changed the twiki instructions accordingly. THanks! Cheers, Arno On 01.12.2014, at 09:40, Urs Langenegger notifications@github.com wrote:
|
|
Hi all, I changed the GT in test.py and I verified that I can run on /RelValBsToMuMu_13/CMSSW_7_3_0_pre2-MCRUN2_73_V1-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO and ancient files /Summer12_DR53X/BuToJPsiK_K2MuPtEtaEtaFilter_8TeV-pythia6-evtgen/AODSIM/PU_S10_START53_V7A-v2 At the moment I think we can live off one HEAD in 7_3_X Cheers, On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:50 AM, heistera notifications@github.com wrote:
|
|
In today's meeting we decided to deprecate the use of old release. Therefore I close this issue. I've added a warning to https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/save/CMS/Bmm4HowtoAnalyze (but did not remove the 53X example, as there might still be some use). |
|
Hello, Now in CandAna::triggerSelection() only those triggers are considered Best regards, |
|
Sorry, wrong list! On 11 Sep 2015, at 12:07, heistera <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote: Hello, Now in CandAna::triggerSelection() only those triggers are considered Best regards, |
I tried to test the instructions on https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/Bmm4HowtoAnalyze and did so in
CMSSW_5_3_22_patch1, what I found to be the latest available release on t3.unl.edu. Unfortunately the last commandscramv1 b -j8failed with output as follows:With
git blame HFDumpUtilities.ccI identified commit 7ece9bf as culprit. Reverting it usinggit revert 7ece9bf8Did the trick. I did not commit such a change, I only did it locally to test.
But: What to do? Do we need to support 5_3_X? If yes, then likely we'll need a separate branch. If not, then forget about.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: