-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move more tests out of sql.spec.ts
#13740
Conversation
@@ -73,7 +74,7 @@ describe.each([ | |||
}) | |||
|
|||
async function createTable(schema: TableSchema) { | |||
table = await config.api.table.save( | |||
return await config.api.table.save( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❤️
@@ -1506,4 +1540,52 @@ describe.each([ | |||
expectQuery({ equal: { "1:1:name": "none" } }).toFindNothing()) | |||
}) | |||
}) | |||
|
|||
// This will never work for Lucene. | |||
// TODO(samwho): fix for SQS |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this meant to be done before merging?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, @mike12345567 actually fixed this. Lemme "uncomment" the test. Good catch!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was just the comment that needed removing, the condition was already allowing the SQS test variant to run.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Description
This continues the work of #13734 in moving more and more tests out of
sql.spec.ts
and into various integration test files.