Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 21, 2023. It is now read-only.

Need to add nameserver to /etc/resolv.conf #228

Open
spiralsuitcase opened this issue Oct 26, 2013 · 6 comments
Open

Need to add nameserver to /etc/resolv.conf #228

spiralsuitcase opened this issue Oct 26, 2013 · 6 comments

Comments

@spiralsuitcase
Copy link

There's no nameserver designated in /etc/resolv.conf. Need to add:

nameserver 8.8.8.8

@catskillmarina
Copy link

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/26/2013 05:53 PM, spiralsuitcase wrote:

There's no nameserver designated in /etc/resolv.conf. Need to
add:

namserver 8.8.8.8

Why not just add a lightweight resolver ? Hate to give google data.

  • --- Marina

--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#228

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=
=gFSy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

@spiralsuitcase
Copy link
Author

Of course that's worth a discussion, meant it more as an example of how to fix something that was missing.

@marcus7777
Copy link

Is this why the internet is not working when i add LAN with DHCP ?

if so why not

208.67.222.222
208.67.220.220
OpenDNS IP Addresses

or use the ones from DHCP?

@virtadpt
Copy link
Member

/etc/resolv.conf is unpopulated by default because the intent is that the Byzantium node doesn't have to do any DNS resolution; the node's clients do, via the local dnsmasq instance. Nodes deal with IP addresses on an "as avahi-daemon hears them" basis. When an Ethernet interface is connected to a node (making it a gateway), ifplugd runs dhcpcd, and if it successfully gets a lease it symlinks the file /etc/resolv.conf.gateway to /etc/resolv.conf.

@Sitwon
Copy link
Member

Sitwon commented Jan 20, 2014

The problem seemed to be that the DNS propagation (which I remember we had
tested several releases back) was not working correctly, so the gateway
node was reachable but it was not propagating it's DNS entries to other
nodes.

On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:17 PM, The Doctor notifications@github.comwrote:

/etc/resolv.conf is unpopulated by default because the intent is that the
Byzantium node doesn't have to do any DNS resolution; the node's clients
do, via the local dnsmasq instance. Nodes deal with IP addresses on an "as
avahi-daemon hears them" basis. When an Ethernet interface is connected to
a node (making it a gateway), ifplugd runs dhcpcd, and if it successfully
gets a lease it symlinks the file /etc/resolv.conf.gateway to
/etc/resolv.conf.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/228#issuecomment-32725688
.

@virtadpt
Copy link
Member

Let's do a quick retest of v0.5b in the near future. I need to get access to someplace with a hardline, but once I do I can set up two test nodes quick and watch their activity.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants