Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] Typo in README.TXT #1236

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

@lostboy529
Copy link

lostboy529 commented Feb 22, 2020

In raising this pull request, I confirm the following (please check boxes):

  • I have read and understood the contributors guide.
  • I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist.
  • I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others.
  • I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer.
  • I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content.
  • I have mentioned this change in the changelog.

My familiarity with the project is as follows (check one):

  • I have never used CCExtractor.
  • I have used CCExtractor just a couple of times.
  • I absolutely love CCExtractor, but have not contributed previously.
  • I am an active contributor to CCExtractor.

{pull request content here}

@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ Essential CC related information and free (with source) tools.

Encoding
--------
This version, in both its Linux and Windows builds generates by
This version, in both its Linux and Windows build generates by

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@cfsmp3

cfsmp3 Feb 22, 2020

Contributor

That's not a typo - build here is a noun, not a verb and there's two builds - the Linux build and the Windows build. We could use binaries instead, of versions. But replacing builds with build is not correct.

@cfsmp3 cfsmp3 closed this Feb 22, 2020
@ccextractor-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

ccextractor-bot commented Feb 22, 2020

CCExtractor CI platform finished running the test files on windows. Below is a summary of the test results:

Report Name Tests Passed
Broken 12/13
DVB 4/7
DVR-MS 2/2
General 27/27
Hauppage 3/3
MP4 3/3
NoCC 10/10
Teletext 21/21
WTV 13/13
XDS 32/34
CEA-708 14/14
DVD 3/3
Options 82/86

It seems that not all tests were passed completely. This is an indication that the output of some files is not as expected (but might be according to you).

Your PR breaks these cases:


Check the result page for more info.
@ccextractor-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

ccextractor-bot commented Feb 22, 2020

CCExtractor CI platform finished running the test files on linux. Below is a summary of the test results:

Report Name Tests Passed
Broken 13/13
DVB 4/7
DVR-MS 2/2
General 27/27
Hauppage 3/3
MP4 3/3
NoCC 10/10
Teletext 15/21
WTV 13/13
XDS 32/34
CEA-708 14/14
DVD 3/3
Options 83/86

It seems that not all tests were passed completely. This is an indication that the output of some files is not as expected (but might be according to you).

Your PR breaks these cases:


Check the result page for more info.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.