Skip to content

CTU-Bern/links

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

links

As it is not possible for an organization to star/follow repositories/organizations, here is a list of potentially interesting github repositories/organizations/users and links to various other things that might be of interest (e.g. guidelines, papers, ...).

Stata

Validation

R

Validation

Validating R itself is a big task. The R Foundation Board has a statement on the issue which covers a few points that need not be covered by a validation of R itself (as they should be covered by the host system, e.g. Windows, MacOS, ...), but puts the onus for other issues in the hands of the organisation using the software.

The R validation hub has various info on the topic, including a white paper. They have also created an R Package, riskmetric for estimating the risk posed by a given package based on it's documentation, bugs/issues, downloads etc.

The valtools package may be useful for documenting validation of R packages (see a presentation on the package here) and a white paper on the topic from the PHUSE group.

Information from RStudio on environment validation

Stata's internal approach to testing https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1536867X0100100102

Verifizierung und Validierung: Unterschied & Definitionen

Misc

Sample size

Useful literature

Reporting guidelines

The EQUATOR Network also has links to many other guidelines (SPIRIT, CARE, AGREE, ...)

Not a reporting guideline per se, but a method of assessing risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies - PROBAST

  • PROBAST paper
  • further explanations and elaboration of PROBAST
  • useful along side TRIPOD perhaps?
  • use of PROBAST to assess ML models in ocology. Long story short, most models are high risk

    123 (81%, 95% CI: 73.8 to 86.4) developed models and 19 (51%, 95% CI: 35.1 to 67.3) validated models were at high risk of bias due to their analysis, mostly due to shortcomings in the analysis including insufficient sample size and split-sample internal validation

The COMET Initiative has a searchable list of standardised outcome sets for diseases, conditions etc.

SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials)

ICEMAN provides an approach for assessing the credibility of subgroup analyses.

Feel free to add to this list.

About

list of potentially interesting links (github repositories, literature, etc)

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published