Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] - Trying to move to env variable in Appveyor #528

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2020
Merged

[WIP] - Trying to move to env variable in Appveyor #528

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2020

Conversation

jmwright
Copy link
Member

@jmwright jmwright commented Dec 1, 2020

@adam-urbanczyk Don't merge yet, I need to see if the environment variable works as expected.

Doing this will resolve #510 and adds another layer of security.

@adam-urbanczyk
Copy link
Member

The #510 is not a real issue, the token is encrypted. It does sound like an additional safety net though.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 1, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #528 (c14ab6b) into master (cf275b0) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #528   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.94%   93.94%           
=======================================
  Files          30       30           
  Lines        6115     6115           
  Branches      640      640           
=======================================
  Hits         5745     5745           
  Misses        235      235           
  Partials      135      135           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cf275b0...c14ab6b. Read the comment docs.

@jmwright
Copy link
Member Author

jmwright commented Dec 4, 2020

I'm going to go ahead and merge this.

@jmwright jmwright merged commit 1b52f10 into CadQuery:master Dec 4, 2020
@adam-urbanczyk
Copy link
Member

Thanks, @jmwright .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sensitive Data Exposure
2 participants