Hotfix/plugin opration #5547
Hotfix/plugin opration #5547
Conversation
|
@lloydzhou is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/store/plugin.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-286: Summary: Improved flexibility and consistency in plugin operations.The changes in this file address the issue with
operationIdmentioned in the PR objectives. The modifications:
- Centralize the logic for retrieving operation IDs using the
getOperationIdfunction.- Update the method for making API calls to use path and method instead of operation ID.
These changes should improve the flexibility and robustness of the plugin system, especially when dealing with APIs that might not always provide consistent operation IDs.
To ensure the changes don't introduce any regressions:
- Thoroughly test the plugin system with various API schemas, including those with and without explicit operation IDs.
- Verify that all existing plugins continue to function correctly with these changes.
- Update any documentation or developer guidelines related to plugin creation or usage to reflect these changes.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 129-129: Use Array.isArray() instead of instanceof Array.
instanceof Array returns false for array-like objects and arrays from other execution contexts.
Unsafe fix: Use Array.isArray() instead.(lint/suspicious/useIsArray)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- app/store/plugin.ts (3 hunks)
- app/utils.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/store/plugin.ts (4)
127-127: LGTM: Consistent use of getOperationId for function mapping.The change from
s[o.operationId]tos[getOperationId(o)]maintains consistency with the previous modification. This ensures that the same method is used for retrieving the operation ID in both the function name and the function mapping.
142-146: LGTM: Updated API call method with improved flexibility.The change from
api.client[o.operationId]toapi.client.paths[o.path][o.method]provides more flexibility in handling API operations. The added comment explains the rationale behind this change, which is good for code maintainability.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact API calls, please run the following verification script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the API call change # Test: Check for any remaining uses of the old API call pattern echo "Checking for any remaining uses of the old API call pattern:" rg --type typescript 'api\.client\[.*operationId' app/ # Test: Check for consistent use of the new API call pattern echo "Checking for consistent use of the new API call pattern:" rg --type typescript 'api\.client\.paths\[.*path\]\[.*method\]' app/
119-119: LGTM: Centralized operation ID retrieval.The use of
getOperationId(o)instead of directly accessingo.operationIdis a good practice. It centralizes the logic for retrieving the operation ID, which can help handle edge cases or provide more flexibility.To ensure the
getOperationIdfunction behaves as expected, please run the following verification script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of getOperationId function # Test: Check the implementation of getOperationId echo "Checking implementation of getOperationId:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function getOperationId($_) { $$$ }' app/utils/index.ts
7-7: LGTM: New utility imports added.The addition of
adapterandgetOperationIdimports from "../utils" is appropriate for the changes made in this file.To ensure these imports are used correctly throughout the file, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Re-running verification scripts with corrected commands to ensure imports are utilized correctly.
Imports are correctly utilized.
The imported
adapterandgetOperationIdare properly used withinapp/store/plugin.ts.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of newly imported utilities # Test: Check for usage of getOperationId echo "Checking usage of getOperationId:" rg --type typescript 'getOperationId\(' app/store/plugin.ts # Test: Check for usage of adapter echo "Checking usage of adapter:" rg --type typescript '\badapter\b' app/store/plugin.tsLength of output: 451
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of newly imported utilities without specifying file type # Test: Check for usage of getOperationId echo "Checking usage of getOperationId:" rg 'getOperationId\(' app/store/plugin.ts # Test: Check for usage of adapter echo "Checking usage of adapter:" rg '\badapter\b' app/store/plugin.tsLength of output: 424
app/utils.ts (2)
381-391: Overall assessment of the changesThe addition of the
getOperationIdfunction aligns with the PR objectives to address issues related to theoperationId. This utility function provides a consistent way to generate or use operation IDs, which should help resolve the discrepancies mentioned in the PR description.However, to fully address the issue:
- Ensure that the suggested improvements for input validation and sanitization are implemented.
- Verify that this function is being used consistently across the codebase wherever operation IDs are needed.
- Consider adding unit tests for this function to cover various input scenarios and edge cases.
381-391: Verify usage ofgetOperationIdacross the codebaseAs this is a newly added utility function, it's important to ensure it's being used consistently across the codebase where operation IDs are needed.
Let's check the usage of this function:
Please review the results to ensure the function is being used appropriately wherever operation IDs are needed in the application.
✅ Verification successful
Re-run usage verification for
getOperationIdwith corrected search parameters--- <!-- [monologue] [task final_response_1/1] Based on the latest shell script output, the `getOperationId` function is imported and used only in `app/store/plugin.ts`. [observations] - The function is correctly imported from `../utils` in `app/store/plugin.ts`. - There are two usages of `getOperationId` within `app/store/plugin.ts`. - No other parts of the codebase are using `getOperationId`, which is expected if it's intended for use within the plugin module only. [analysis] - Since `getOperationId` is a newly added utility function, it's important to ensure it's used where necessary. - The shell script results show that its usage is confined to `app/store/plugin.ts`, indicating controlled and intended usage. - No evidence suggests that `getOperationId` should be used elsewhere unless specified by design requirements. [actions] - Conclude that the usage of `getOperationId` is consistent and as intended. - No further shell scripts are necessary. - Mark the verification as successful. --> **Usage of `getOperationId` is consistent across the codebase** The `getOperationId` function is correctly imported and utilized in `app/store/plugin.ts`. No additional usages were found elsewhere, indicating consistent and intended application. </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of getOperationId function across the codebase # Search for imports of getOperationId echo "Searching for imports of getOperationId:" rg --type typescript --type javascript "import.*getOperationId.*from.*utils" -g '!app/utils.ts' # Search for usage of getOperationId echo "\nSearching for usage of getOperationId:" rg --type typescript --type javascript "getOperationId\(" -g '!app/utils.ts'Length of output: 428
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of getOperationId function across the codebase # Search for imports of getOperationId echo "Searching for imports of getOperationId:" rg "import.*getOperationId.*from.*utils" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' -g '!app/utils.ts' # Search for usage of getOperationId echo "\nSearching for usage of getOperationId:" rg "getOperationId\(" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' -g '!app/utils.ts'Length of output: 568
| export function getOperationId(operation: { | ||
| operationId?: string; | ||
| method: string; | ||
| path: string; | ||
| }) { | ||
| // pattern '^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$' | ||
| return ( | ||
| operation?.operationId || | ||
| `${operation.method.toUpperCase()}${operation.path.replaceAll("/", "_")}` | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance input validation and sanitization in getOperationId function
The function looks good overall, but consider the following improvements:
- Sanitize the
pathinput to handle trailing slashes and spaces. - Validate that
methodandpathare non-empty strings. - Consider enforcing the pattern mentioned in the comment (
^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$) for the generated operationId.
Here's a suggested implementation with these improvements:
export function getOperationId(operation: {
operationId?: string;
method: string;
path: string;
}) {
if (operation.operationId) {
return operation.operationId;
}
if (!operation.method || !operation.path) {
throw new Error("Method and path are required to generate operationId");
}
const sanitizedPath = operation.path.trim().replace(/^\/+|\/+$/g, "");
const generatedId = `${operation.method.toUpperCase()}_${sanitizedPath.replace(/\//g, "_")}`;
// Enforce the pattern '^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$'
return generatedId.replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9_-]/g, "_");
}This implementation:
- Returns the
operationIdif provided. - Throws an error if
methodorpathare empty. - Trims and removes leading/trailing slashes from the path.
- Enforces the pattern by replacing any characters not matching
[a-zA-Z0-9_-]with underscores.
|
Your build has completed! |
💻 变更类型 | Change Type
🔀 变更说明 | Description of Change
have
operationIdmissing
operationId📝 补充信息 | Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements