Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reverse tuple arguments in Function, TimeFunction, and SparseTimeFunction construction #123

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2022

Conversation

deckerla
Copy link
Member

this makes them consistent with Grid construction and Julian ordering.
Note that this does not apply to SparseFunctions, since they are fundamentally one-dimensional objects.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 23, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #123 (ebfe28c) into master (27c4c0d) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #123   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.83%   99.83%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines         592      592           
=======================================
  Hits          591      591           
  Misses          1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/Devito.jl 99.83% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 27c4c0d...ebfe28c. Read the comment docs.

@deckerla deckerla merged commit d1417ae into master May 23, 2022
@deckerla deckerla deleted the reverse_dims branch May 23, 2022 01:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants