Return value js should render the template, as documented, instead of serializing the second component

[aherranz]

No description provided.

[danikp]

Actually, i think mistake is in documentation. cause currently it states that sending {js, Vars} is same as {ok, Vars, ["Content-Type: application/javascript"]) and it does not make much sense from point of having additional option.
Current behavior provides an ability to return json without having template file at all and it's really useful option. For case you build some complex API, it could save creating dozens of template files

[aherranz]

I do not understand why json is mentioned in your comment.

On my view, {js, Vars} as an alias of {ok, Vars, ["Content-Type: application/javascript"]} makes sense at least as a documentation resource ("this action serves javascript"). The problem is that it does not serve javascript but it directly outputs Vars (just in case Vars is a string, otherwise, it fails).

In my case, I am using this render to generate a javascripts used as table of translated strings for my front-end code.

[danikp]

my bad, there is {json, Vars} and {js, Vars} and I confused between them. Ok, {js, Vars} does not have much sense for me as a alias for {ok, Vars, ["Content-Type: application/javascript"]}, but if it exist, it should work as documented. Merging. Thanks.