Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Literate internal tide validation experiment? #1694

Closed
navidcy opened this issue May 25, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Literate internal tide validation experiment? #1694

navidcy opened this issue May 25, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
documentation 📜 The sacred scrolls question 💭 No such thing as a stupid question

Comments

@navidcy
Copy link
Collaborator

navidcy commented May 25, 2021

Should we promote the internal tide validation experiment to a literate one that goes into the docs?

@navidcy navidcy added question 💭 No such thing as a stupid question documentation 📜 The sacred scrolls labels May 25, 2021
@hdrake
Copy link
Contributor

hdrake commented Dec 30, 2022

I can take a stab at literate-ing a version of this validation experiment, although I suggest using scalings appropriate for the deep ocean.

I think it would be nice to rework the experiment into something like this example script, in which I essentially reproduce the MITgcm setup used in Nikurashin and Legg (2011) and Yi et al (2017).

Here's a video showing the solution for ~20 M2 tidal cycles or so.

short_internal_tide.mov

Another idea is to do the simulation in the linear limit (very small topography) and validate some of the results with analytical solutions.

@glwagner
Copy link
Member

I'm closing this issue because I'm judging that it's not of current, timely relevance to Oceananigans development. If you would like to make it a higher priority or if you think the issue was closed in error please feel free to re-open.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation 📜 The sacred scrolls question 💭 No such thing as a stupid question
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants