You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We might need to implement the K-Profile boundary layer turbulence closure so that we can use it to compare the CATKE performance.
Ideally, we'd like to calibrate the K-Profile parametrisation using OceanTurbulenceParameterEstimation.jl alongside with CATKE closure and then compare how the two perform under various scenarios.
I suggest that we implement a more modern turbulence closure if we would like a second one for comparisons with CATKE. Implementing any "production" turbulence closure will be a significant effort, and we would like it to be worth both the time to implement, and the cost of code maintenance into the future. This will also set us up for comparisons with other ocean models like MOM6 or NEMO.
I'm closing this issue because I'm judging that it's not of current, timely relevance to Oceananigans development. If you would like to make it a higher priority or if you think the issue was closed in error please feel free to re-open.
We might need to implement the K-Profile boundary layer turbulence closure so that we can use it to compare the CATKE performance.
Ideally, we'd like to calibrate the K-Profile parametrisation using OceanTurbulenceParameterEstimation.jl alongside with CATKE closure and then compare how the two perform under various scenarios.
@glwagner, would it be easy to implement KPP, similarly as done in OceanTurb.jl?
cc @rafferrari
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: