Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize cluster node list change but DirectoryMonitor can't sense it #42826

Merged

Conversation

zhongyuankai
Copy link
Contributor

@zhongyuankai zhongyuankai commented Oct 31, 2022

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Improvement

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Make inserts into distributed tables handle updated cluster configuration properly. When the list of cluster nodes is dynamically updated, the Directory Monitor of the distribution table cannot sense the new node, and the Directory Monitor must be re-noded to sense it.

Information about CI checks: https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/development/continuous-integration/

@robot-ch-test-poll robot-ch-test-poll added the pr-feature Pull request with new product feature label Oct 31, 2022
@zhongyuankai
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can you help with the review?

Copy link
Collaborator

@azat azat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR had been lost, but it looks good to me (except for minor comments, and you will need to rebase on top master, since there was some refactoring in this place), I hope that you will have to finish it!
And it definitely needs an integration test.

src/Storages/StorageDistributed.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
@zhongyuankai
Copy link
Contributor Author

@azat ok, I will continue to complete it if necessary

@zhongyuankai
Copy link
Contributor Author

@azat I need help. During the process of writing integration tests, if nodes are dynamically brought online or offline

@azat
Copy link
Collaborator

azat commented Oct 16, 2023

I guess you don't actually need to change their online/offline status, change remote_servers should be enough (if I'm not missing anything).

But you want to change online/offline, you can use node.stop_clickhouse() helper (for this you need also create cluster with keep_alive), but I haven't checked the code during writing this, so maybe there are some differences

@zhongyuankai
Copy link
Contributor Author

I guess you don't actually need to change their online/offline status, change remote_servers should be enough (if I'm not missing anything).

Thank you very much for your reply, i have added an integration test, can you help me review it?

@azat azat added the can be tested Allows running workflows for external contributors label Nov 24, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@azat azat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the delay (was on vacation), LGTM

@robot-ch-test-poll4
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll4 commented Nov 24, 2023

This is an automated comment for commit beabc52 with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Successful checks
Check nameDescriptionStatus
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR✅ success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process✅ success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Docker image for serversThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here✅ success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc✅ success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment✅ success
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful✅ success
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
Push to DockerhubThe check for building and pushing the CI related docker images to docker hub✅ success
SQLTestThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
SQLancerFuzzing tests that detect logical bugs with SQLancer tool✅ success
SqllogicRun clickhouse on the sqllogic test set against sqlite and checks that all statements are passed✅ success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors✅ success
Style CheckRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report✅ success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types✅ success
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts✅ success
Check nameDescriptionStatus
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc❌ failure

@azat
Copy link
Collaborator

azat commented Nov 24, 2023

Docs Check — expect adding docs for pr-feature
Style Check — Check black failed.

@zhongyuankai can you please fix this

@zhongyuankai
Copy link
Contributor Author

@azat Thanks for your reply, I will fix it.

@azat
Copy link
Collaborator

azat commented Nov 26, 2023

Docs Check — expect adding docs for pr-feature

Still an issue, but let's just change the changelog entry to Improvement (it does not requires documentation)

@azat
Copy link
Collaborator

azat commented Nov 26, 2023

Integration tests flaky check (asan) — Failed tests found: error: 0, passed: 0, fail: 1, skipped: 0, broken: 0, not_fail: 0

New test fails

@robot-ch-test-poll2 robot-ch-test-poll2 added pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements and removed pr-feature Pull request with new product feature labels Nov 27, 2023
@zhongyuankai
Copy link
Contributor Author

Stateless tests (release, analyzer) — fail: 2, passed: 5880, skipped: 9

@azat Already fixed, this failure should have nothing to do with changes.

@azat
Copy link
Collaborator

azat commented Dec 3, 2023

Integration tests flaky check (asan) — Failed tests found: error: 2, passed: 0, fail: 0, skipped: 0, broken: 0, not_fail: 0

Looks like internal CI issue - #56108

Copy link
Collaborator

@azat azat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Now someone from the official team should take a look, let's ask @alexey-milovidov

@antaljanosbenjamin antaljanosbenjamin self-assigned this Dec 5, 2023
Copy link
Member

@antaljanosbenjamin antaljanosbenjamin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one minor change and I think it is good to go! Thank you @azat for catching issues and doing the review!

src/Storages/StorageDistributed.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@antaljanosbenjamin antaljanosbenjamin merged commit 7b0f8d4 into ClickHouse:master Dec 8, 2023
337 of 338 checks passed
@zhongyuankai zhongyuankai deleted the optimize_cluster_node_data branch December 22, 2023 17:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
can be tested Allows running workflows for external contributors pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants