Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix all key value is null and group use rollup return wrong answer #49282

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 5, 2023

Conversation

loneylee
Copy link
Contributor

@loneylee loneylee commented Apr 27, 2023

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Bug Fix (user-visible misbehavior in an official stable release)

FIx when group by single key. And key type is LowCardinality or Nullablle, value is all null.Group use rollup or with totals return wrong result.
Fix #49280

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Fix a bug about grouped single key use rollup or with totals when value is all null, return empty result.

Documentation entry for user-facing changes

  • Documentation is written (mandatory for new features)

Information about CI checks: https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/development/continuous-integration/

@robot-ch-test-poll robot-ch-test-poll added the pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default label Apr 27, 2023
@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov added the can be tested Allows running workflows for external contributors label Apr 28, 2023
@nickitat nickitat self-assigned this May 1, 2023
@nickitat
Copy link
Member

nickitat commented May 1, 2023

@nickitat nickitat added the force tests Force test ignoring fast test output. label May 1, 2023
Copy link
Member

@nickitat nickitat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@alexey-milovidov
Copy link
Member

@loneylee, the reference file wasn't generated correctly.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented May 4, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@robot-ch-test-poll4
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll4 commented May 4, 2023

This is an automated comment for commit 2799703 with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running
The full report is available here
The overall status of the commit is 🔴 failure

Check nameDescriptionStatus
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help🟢 success
Bugfix validate checkChecks that either a new test (functional or integration) or there some changed tests that fail with the binary built on master branch🟢 success
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR🟡 pending
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process🟢 success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help🟢 success
Docker image for serversThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub🟢 success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here🟢 success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc🟢 success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment🟢 success
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests🔴 failure
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful🟢 success
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests🟢 success
Push to DockerhubThe check for building and pushing the CI related docker images to docker hub🟢 success
SQLancerFuzzing tests that detect logical bugs with SQLancer tool🟢 success
SqllogicRun clickhouse on the sqllogic test set against sqlite and checks that all statements are passed🟢 success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc🟢 success
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc🔴 failure
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors🔴 failure
Style CheckRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report🟢 success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types🟢 success
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts🟢 success

@loneylee
Copy link
Contributor Author

loneylee commented May 5, 2023

@alexey-milovidov @nickitat
The ci error looks like not relation to my pr. Need i rerun it?

@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov merged commit dfbba48 into ClickHouse:master May 5, 2023
253 of 258 checks passed
@loneylee loneylee deleted the 49280 branch May 5, 2023 04:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
can be tested Allows running workflows for external contributors force tests Force test ignoring fast test output. pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Group by null value key use rollup with wrong answer
6 participants