Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize the merge if all hashSets are singleLevel in UniqExactSet #52973

Merged
merged 9 commits into from Aug 30, 2023

Conversation

jiebinn
Copy link
Contributor

@jiebinn jiebinn commented Aug 3, 2023

In PR(#50748), it has added new phase parallelizeMergePrepare before merge if all the hashSets are not all singleLevel or not all twoLevel. Then it will convert all the singleLevelSet to twoLevelSet in parallel, which will increase the CPU utilization and QPS.

But if all the hashtables are singleLevel, it could also benefit from the parallelizeMergePrepare optimization in most cases if the hashtable size are not too small.

Then we should tune the threshold of the hashtable size. The total dataSet should not be that large. The unique column count should be proportional to the number of hits_v1. Keep the unique column count very small or we will never find the cross point in limited threads. And we would choose the dataSet hits_v1 and the column SearchPhase. We have to make sure all the hashtable are singleLevel no matter what is the threads_num. Also, we have to make sure there is a cross point in the figure.

By tuning the Query SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT SearchPhase) FROM hits_v1 in different threads, we have got the mild threshold 6,000 (total_hashtable_size/hashtable_num). COUNT(DISTINCT SearchPhase) is only 132,256. Even when threads_num is very small, the hashtable size could not reach the threshold 100,000 and they are all singleLevel.
image

Test patch with the Query 'SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT Title) FROM hits_v1' on 2x80 vCPUs server. If the threads are less than 48, the hashSets are all twoLevel or mixed by singleLevel and twoLevel. If the threads are over 56, all the hashSets are singleLevel. And the QPS has got at most 2.35x performance gain.
image

Threads Opt/Base
8       100.0%
16      99.4%
24      110.3%
32      99.9%
40      99.3%
48      99.8%
56      183.0%
64      234.7%
72      233.1%
80      229.9%
88      224.5%
96      229.6%
104     235.1%
112     229.5%
120     229.1%
128     217.8%
136     222.9%
144     217.8%
152     204.3%
160     203.2%

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Performance Improvement

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Optimize the merge if all hashSets are singleLevel in UniqExactSet.

update from upstream master branch
@clickhouse-ci
Copy link

clickhouse-ci bot commented Aug 3, 2023

This is an automatic comment. The PR descriptions does not match the template.

Please, edit it accordingly.

The error is: Changelog entry required for category 'Performance Improvement'

1 similar comment
@clickhouse-ci
Copy link

clickhouse-ci bot commented Aug 3, 2023

This is an automatic comment. The PR descriptions does not match the template.

Please, edit it accordingly.

The error is: Changelog entry required for category 'Performance Improvement'

@jiebinn jiebinn changed the title Optimize the merge if all hashSets are singleLevel Optimize the merge if all hashSets are singleLevel in UniqExactSet Aug 3, 2023
@clickhouse-ci
Copy link

clickhouse-ci bot commented Aug 3, 2023

This is an automatic comment. The PR descriptions does not match the template.

Please, edit it accordingly.

The error is: Changelog entry required for category 'Performance Improvement'

@jiebinn
Copy link
Contributor Author

jiebinn commented Aug 3, 2023

Hi @nickitat, the previous PR '#50748' is only used when the hashSets are mixed by singleLevel and twoLevel. But I have found that if all the hashSets are singleLevel, it could also benefit from the previous patch a lot in most cases. I have submitted the additional PR in that case if all singleLevelHash.

@nickitat nickitat self-assigned this Aug 3, 2023
@robot-ch-test-poll2 robot-ch-test-poll2 added the pr-performance Pull request with some performance improvements label Aug 3, 2023
@robot-ch-test-poll2
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll2 commented Aug 3, 2023

This is an automated comment for commit 4cea40b with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running
The full report is available here
The overall status of the commit is 🔴 failure

Check nameDescriptionStatus
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help🟢 success
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR🟢 success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process🟢 success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help🟢 success
Docker image for serversThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub🟢 success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here🟢 success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc🟢 success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment🟢 success
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests🟢 success
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful🟢 success
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests🔴 failure
Push to DockerhubThe check for building and pushing the CI related docker images to docker hub🟢 success
SQLancerFuzzing tests that detect logical bugs with SQLancer tool🟢 success
SqllogicRun clickhouse on the sqllogic test set against sqlite and checks that all statements are passed🟢 success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc🟢 success
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc🟢 success
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors🟢 success
Style CheckRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report🟢 success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types🟢 success
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts🟢 success

@nickitat nickitat added the can be tested Allows running workflows for external contributors label Aug 3, 2023
In PR(ClickHouse#50748), it has added new phase
`parallelizeMergePrepare` before merge if all the hashSets are not all singleLevel
or not all twoLevel. Then it will convert all the singleLevelSet to twoLevelSet in
parallel, which will increase the CPU utilization and QPS.

But if all the hashtables are singleLevel, it could also benefit from the
`parallelizeMergePrepare` optimization in most cases if the hashtable size are not
too small. By tuning the Query `SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT SearchPhase) FROM hits_v1`
in different threads, we have got the mild threshold 6,000.

Test patch with the Query 'SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT Title) FROM hits_v1' on 2x80 vCPUs
server. If the threads are less than 48, the hashSets are all twoLevel or mixed by
singleLevel and twoLevel. If the threads are over 56, all the hashSets are singleLevel.
And the QPS has got at most 2.35x performance gain.

Threads	Opt/Base
8	100.0%
16	99.4%
24	110.3%
32	99.9%
40	99.3%
48	99.8%
56	183.0%
64	234.7%
72	233.1%
80	229.9%
88	224.5%
96	229.6%
104	235.1%
112	229.5%
120	229.1%
128	217.8%
136	222.9%
144	217.8%
152	204.3%
160	203.2%

Signed-off-by: Jiebin Sun <jiebin.sun@intel.com>
@jiebinn
Copy link
Contributor Author

jiebinn commented Aug 11, 2023

The CI error fail to generate performance report seems not related to this patch.

@jiebinn
Copy link
Contributor Author

jiebinn commented Aug 30, 2023

Hi @nickitat , thanks for your help to review the patch. BTW, do you think what else should I do for this PR?

@nickitat nickitat merged commit 7c529e5 into ClickHouse:master Aug 30, 2023
267 of 270 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
can be tested Allows running workflows for external contributors pr-performance Pull request with some performance improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants