Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove more old code of projection analysis #55579

Merged
merged 16 commits into from Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

CurtizJ
Copy link
Member

@CurtizJ CurtizJ commented Oct 12, 2023

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Not for changelog (changelog entry is not required)

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Addition to #55112.

@robot-ch-test-poll4 robot-ch-test-poll4 added the pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog label Oct 12, 2023
@robot-ch-test-poll4
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll4 commented Oct 12, 2023

This is an automated comment for commit 3e933c9 with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Successful checks
Check nameDescriptionStatus
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR✅ success
ClickBenchRuns [ClickBench](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/) with instant-attach table✅ success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process✅ success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Docker image for serversThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docs checkThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here✅ success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc✅ success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment✅ success
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful✅ success
SQLTestThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
SQLancerFuzzing tests that detect logical bugs with SQLancer tool✅ success
SqllogicRun clickhouse on the sqllogic test set against sqlite and checks that all statements are passed✅ success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors✅ success
Style CheckRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report✅ success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types✅ success
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts✅ success
Check nameDescriptionStatus
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests❌ failure
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests❌ failure
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc❌ failure

Copy link
Member

@Algunenano Algunenano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've left some minor comments about things I've seen in the changes.

The test failures seem related:

  • ClickHouse Stateless Tests (release, Analyzer) - > Analyzer + projections + prewhere (02796_projection_date_filter_on_view and 01710_aggregate_projections)
  • ClickHouse Stateless Tests (tsan, S3 Storage). TSAN detected a couple of issues but they look related to CH local and not to these changes, but it should be confirmed.

src/Interpreters/InterpreterSelectQuery.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
/// This flag is also used for projection analysis.
/// It is needed because lazy normal projections require special planning in FetchColumns stage, such as adding WHERE transform.
/// It is also used to avoid adding aggregating step when aggregate projection is chosen.
bool is_projection_query = false;
/// This flag is needed for projection description.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we update the comments around ignore_ast_optimizations and ignore_setting_constraints related to projections?

Copy link
Member Author

@CurtizJ CurtizJ Dec 4, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think no, because we still use them in ProjectionDescription.

@CurtizJ
Copy link
Member Author

CurtizJ commented Oct 19, 2023

The test failures seem related

Yes, they are related. I tried to fix it but unsuccessfully currently.

@CurtizJ
Copy link
Member Author

CurtizJ commented Dec 5, 2023

Tests related to projections have been magically fixed by merging fresh master. I think it's because of #56502. So now we can merge this PR.

@Algunenano
Copy link
Member

So now we can merge this PR.

There is still some failing tests with the analyzer -> https://s3.amazonaws.com/clickhouse-test-reports/55579/69896d94bead717ebc75bdf1907935e6057ae98c/stateless_tests__release__analyzer_.html. Both involving projections and PREWHERE

@CurtizJ CurtizJ force-pushed the remove-old-projections-code branch from e13ed63 to cf4604b Compare January 3, 2024 16:59
@CurtizJ
Copy link
Member Author

CurtizJ commented Jan 4, 2024

I reverted commit a01acf5 and returned back old behaviour when we used StorageSnapshot with projection and when we have access to both metadata snapshots of table and projection. For some reason using only projection metadata doesn't work in optimizePrewhere. We can fix it and remove projection from StorageSnapshot in separate PR.

@@ -2556,56 +2493,28 @@ void InterpreterSelectQuery::executeFetchColumns(QueryProcessingStage::Enum proc

/// Create optimizer with prepared actions.
/// Maybe we will need to calc input_order_info later, e.g. while reading from StorageMerge.
if ((optimize_read_in_order || optimize_aggregation_in_order)
&& (!query_info.projection || query_info.projection->complete))
if (optimize_read_in_order || optimize_aggregation_in_order)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This if now would probably be easier to read if it was:

    if (optimize_read_in_order)
         ...
    else if (optimize_aggregation_in_order)
         ...

As both options are separate there is no need of doing (if (a || b) { if (a) else ...)

@CurtizJ
Copy link
Member Author

CurtizJ commented Jan 9, 2024

Integration tests: failed tests with keeper which are flaky now.

Performance Comparison: parallel_index - #58593

Stateless tests (release, DatabaseReplicated): 02210_processors_profile_log - maybe related but unclear how

@CurtizJ CurtizJ merged commit 2fd0f7b into ClickHouse:master Jan 9, 2024
258 of 264 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants