Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add system.dropped_tables_parts table - second attempt #58038

Merged

Conversation

yakov-olkhovskiy
Copy link
Member

Changelog category (leave one):

  • New Feature

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Table system.dropped_tables_parts contains parts of system.dropped_tables tables (dropped but not yet removed tables)

Documentation entry for user-facing changes

  • Documentation is written (mandatory for new features)

@robot-clickhouse-ci-2 robot-clickhouse-ci-2 added the pr-feature Pull request with new product feature label Dec 19, 2023
@robot-clickhouse-ci-2
Copy link
Contributor

robot-clickhouse-ci-2 commented Dec 19, 2023

This is an automated comment for commit b05211c with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Successful checks
Check nameDescriptionStatus
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR✅ success
ClickBenchRuns [ClickBench](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/) with instant-attach table✅ success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process✅ success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Docker image for serversThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docs CheckBuilds and tests the documentation✅ success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here✅ success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc✅ success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment✅ success
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful✅ success
SQLTestThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
SQLancerFuzzing tests that detect logical bugs with SQLancer tool✅ success
SqllogicRun clickhouse on the sqllogic test set against sqlite and checks that all statements are passed✅ success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Style CheckRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report✅ success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types✅ success
Check nameDescriptionStatus
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests❌ failure
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors❌ failure
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts❌ failure

@yakov-olkhovskiy
Copy link
Member Author

@antonio2368 could you please specify which stateless tests were failing after this PR?

@antonio2368
Copy link
Member

@yakov-olkhovskiy all test failed here would consistently fail with Databse ordinary
https://s3.amazonaws.com/clickhouse-test-reports/0/34ca74878eb7fbf92c8911d3abfbbd3025fabf39/stateless_tests__release__databaseordinary_.html

Seems we run with that database only on master so you couldn't have noticed that in PR.
You can test locally by specifying --db-engine Ordinary flag for clickhouse-test.
e.g. ./tests/clickhouse-test 02723_zookeeper_name --db-engine Ordinary

@tavplubix
Copy link
Member

We also check that new (and midified) tests work with Ordinary database in the flaky check, but the modified 02698_marked_dropped_tables is disabled for Ordinary:

2023-12-19 18:04:13 Running about 1 stateless tests (ForkPoolWorker-2).
2023-12-19 18:04:13 
2023-12-19 18:04:13 02698_marked_dropped_tables:                                            [ SKIPPED ] 0.00 sec. - not running for current build
2023-12-19 18:04:13 
2023-12-19 18:04:13 0 tests passed. 1 tests skipped. 0.00 s elapsed (ForkPoolWorker-2).
2023-12-19 18:04:13 
2023-12-19 18:04:13 0 tests passed. 0 tests skipped. 0.00 s elapsed (MainProcess).
2023-12-19 18:04:18 Won't run stateful tests because test data wasn't loaded.

and the previous PR did not have any tests at all

@tavplubix
Copy link
Member

Btw, what's the usecase for the new table?

StoragesDroppedInfoStream::StoragesDroppedInfoStream(const SelectQueryInfo & query_info, ContextPtr context)
: StoragesInfoStreamBase(context)
{
needsLock = false;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks ugly, however, acquiring the lock for share (especially in Atomic database, especially if the table is dropped) is almost no-op (no chance it will wait for something)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this class is common for both - dropped and alive tables - we need the way to distinct between just-dropped table for system.parts and table for system.dropped_tables_parts
but yes, it's ugly - will try to improve

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
#include "Common/SipHash.h"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
#include "Common/SipHash.h"
#include <Common/SipHash.h>

Comment on lines +140 to +146
UUID storage_uuid = storage->getStorageID().uuid;
if (database->getEngineName() == "Ordinary")
{
SipHash hash;
hash.update(database_name);
hash.update(table_name);
storage_uuid = hash.get128();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should not display any UUIDs for tables from Ordinary databases, otherwise, it may be confusing. Also, assigning a random hash to UUID is wrong, because this UUID is likely to be invalid, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universally_unique_identifier#Version_4_(random)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we don't display this UUID - we need it only as a key for internal map - previously we used database_name+table_name pair here, but because we can delete table with the same name multiple times, it can't be used to uniquely identify such tables in dropped_tables, so I replaced this pair with table's UUID

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm confused here, wouldn't we also get the same hash for the same database - table name pair and still have the same problem for Ordinary databases as without UUID?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@antonio2368 yes, we would, but per my knowledge Ordinary do not use postponed deletion

DROP TABLE 25400_dropped_tables;

SELECT table, engine FROM system.dropped_tables WHERE database = currentDatabase() LIMIT 1;
DESCRIBE TABLE system.dropped_tables;

SELECT database, table, name FROM system.dropped_tables_parts WHERE database = currentDatabase() and table = '25400_dropped_tables';
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's also add a test that runs select * from system.dropped_tables_parts format Null and works in parallel with other tests

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

... format Null will not test the issue with Ordinary - I added a test which will...

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but the purpose of this query is to find race conditions, not issues with Ordinary

@yakov-olkhovskiy
Copy link
Member Author

Btw, what's the usecase for the new table?

After DROP TABLE parts are removed from system.parts but not yet deleted physically - the purpose of this table is to have access to info about these parts. Particularly it allows to account for difference between parts count in system.parts and metric PartsActive - it only updates when parts physically deleted.

@yakov-olkhovskiy yakov-olkhovskiy merged commit cfa41e7 into master Jan 9, 2024
262 of 265 checks passed
@yakov-olkhovskiy yakov-olkhovskiy deleted the revert-58022-revert-57555-ft-dropped_tables_parts branch January 9, 2024 05:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-feature Pull request with new product feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants