Analyzer: fix storage replacement with insertion block

[yakov-olkhovskiy]

Changelog category (leave one):

• Bug Fix (user-visible misbehavior in an official stable release)

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Fix analyzer - insertion from select with subquery referencing insertion table should process only insertion block for all table expressions.
Fixes #58080.
follow-up #50857

[robot-clickhouse-ci-1]

This is an automated comment for commit 7826706 with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Successful checks

Check name	Description	Status
ClickBench	Runs [ClickBench](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/) with instant-attach table	✅ success
ClickHouse build check	Builds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process	✅ success
Compatibility check	Checks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help	✅ success
Docker server and keeper images	There's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS	✅ success
Docs check	There's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS	✅ success
Fast tests	There's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS	✅ success
Flaky tests	Checks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc	✅ success
Install packages	Checks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment	✅ success
Integration tests	The integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests	✅ success
Mergeable Check	Checks if all other necessary checks are successful	✅ success
Performance Comparison	Measure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests	✅ success
SQLancer	Fuzzing tests that detect logical bugs with SQLancer tool	✅ success
Sqllogic	Run clickhouse on the sqllogic test set against sqlite and checks that all statements are passed	✅ success
Stateless tests	Runs stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc	✅ success
Stress test	Runs stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors	✅ success
Style check	There's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS	✅ success
Unit tests	Runs the unit tests for different release types	✅ success
Upgrade check	Runs stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts	✅ success

Check name	Description	Status
AST fuzzer	Runs randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help	❌ failure
CI running	A meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR	⏳ pending
Stateful tests	Runs stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc	❌ failure

[vdimir]

Do we have a tests dedicated to this specific case? If not it's worth adding

[vdimir]

Wouldn't it be better to compare uuids? Though, it's difficult to imagine a case when comparing full names is a problem.

[novikd]

In general LGTM. We need to finish it ASAP.

[novikd]

I pushed some changes after the review. Let's merge this PR if CI doesn't find any issues. I don't think full table name vs UUID comparison is a stopper here.

[novikd]

I suspect that tests fail because it's incorrect. There are no TableNodes in the table function arguments. There can be QueryNodes but they are unresolved, we can't do anything with them.