Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Copy S3 file GCP fallback to buffer copy #60164

Conversation

kitaisreal
Copy link
Collaborator

@kitaisreal kitaisreal commented Feb 20, 2024

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Improvement

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Copy S3 file GCP fallback to buffer copy in case GCP returned Internal Error with GATEWAY_TIMEOUT HTTP error code.

@kitaisreal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sometimes during CopyObject request in GCP error can be like this:

AWSClient: Response status: 413, Request Entity Too Large
AWSClient: AWSErrorMarshaller: Encountered Unknown AWSError 'EntityTooLarge': Copy spanning locations and/or storage classes could not complete within 30 seconds.
Please use the Rewrite method in the JSON API (https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/json_api/v1/objects/rewrite) instead.
AWSClient: AWSXmlClient: HTTP response code: 413
Resolved remote host IP address: storage.googleapis.com:443
Request ID:
Exception name: EntityTooLarge
Error message: Unable to parse ExceptionName: EntityTooLarge Message: Copy spanning locations and/or storage classes could not complete within 30 seconds.
Please use the Rewrite method in the JSON API (https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/json_api/v1/objects/rewrite) instead.
7 response headers:
connection : close
content-length : 306
content-type : application/xml; charset=UTF-8
date : Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:39:17 GMT
server : UploadServer
vary : Origin

And this looks right according to documentation https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/json_api/v1/status-codes#413_Payload_Too_Large.

But sometimes error can be like this, and in documentation it is not specified that GATEWAY_TIMEOUT can be returned during CopyObject request https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/json_api/v1/status-codes#504_Gateway_Timeout.

2024.02.20 08:45:25.972085 [ 435636 ] {} <Information> AWSClient: Response status: 504, Gateway Timeout
2024.02.20 08:45:25.972212 [ 435636 ] {} <Information> AWSClient: AWSErrorMarshaller: Encountered AWSError 'InternalError': Copy spanning locations and/or storage classes could not complete within 30 seconds. Please use the Rewrite method in the JSON API (https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/json_api/v1/objects/rewrite) instead.
2024.02.20 08:45:25.972273 [ 435636 ] {} <Information> AWSClient: AWSXmlClient: HTTP response code: 504
Resolved remote host IP address: storage.googleapis.com:443
Request ID:
Exception name: InternalError
Error message: Copy spanning locations and/or storage classes could not complete within 30 seconds.
Please use the Rewrite method in the JSON API (https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/json_api/v1/objects/rewrite) instead.
7 response headers:
connection : close
content-length : 400
content-type : application/xml; charset=UTF-8
date : Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:45:25 GMT
server : UploadServer

Maybe we can somehow better understand this specific case, and properly fallback to buffer copy.

@robot-ch-test-poll3 robot-ch-test-poll3 added the pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements label Feb 20, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll3
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll3 commented Feb 20, 2024

This is an automated comment for commit 25bfcdd with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Successful checks
Check nameDescriptionStatus
A SyncThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
ClickBenchRuns [ClickBench](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/) with instant-attach table✅ success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process✅ success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Docker keeper imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docker server imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docs checkBuilds and tests the documentation✅ success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here✅ success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc✅ success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment✅ success
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful✅ success
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
SQLTestThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
SQLancerFuzzing tests that detect logical bugs with SQLancer tool✅ success
SqllogicRun clickhouse on the sqllogic test set against sqlite and checks that all statements are passed✅ success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Style checkRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report✅ success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types✅ success
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts✅ success
Check nameDescriptionStatus
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help❌ failure
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR⏳ pending
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests❌ failure
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc❌ failure
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors❌ failure

@antonio2368
Copy link
Member

I think this is related to this issue #59660 (comment)
Fallback is okay for now, but to avoid heavy reads/writes on copy we can support rewrite from GCS' JSON API which contains rewriteToken so a copy is chunked similarly as for multipart copy in S3.

@kitaisreal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think this is related to this issue #59660 (comment) Fallback is okay for now, but to avoid heavy reads/writes on copy we can support rewrite from GCS' JSON API which contains rewriteToken so a copy is chunked similarly as for multipart copy in S3.

Totally agree, we need to support rewrite.

@vitlibar vitlibar self-assigned this Feb 20, 2024
if (outcome.GetError().GetExceptionName() == "EntityTooLarge" ||
outcome.GetError().GetExceptionName() == "InvalidRequest" ||
outcome.GetError().GetExceptionName() == "InvalidArgument" ||
(outcome.GetError().GetExceptionName() == "InternalError" && outcome.GetError().GetResponseCode() == Aws::Http::HttpResponseCode::GATEWAY_TIMEOUT))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Checking for GATEWAY_TIMEOUT doesn't seem completely correct because it can mean something else.
Can we check something else to identify that kind of response?

Copy link
Member

@vitlibar vitlibar Feb 20, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For example, we could search in the response for this text use the Rewrite method in the JSON API instead.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree. I think we need to change this check a bit.
But I am not sure if check for some specific substring in error message is okay.
@antonio2368 What do you think ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm I agree with @vitlibar, we would risk fallback to heavy operation instead of simply retrying the copy if the error can be avoided by a simple retry.
and both the code and exception name seem generic so we would have to search in the respones

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated.

@kitaisreal kitaisreal force-pushed the copy-s3-file-gcp-fallback-to-buffer-copy branch from 6e141ee to 25bfcdd Compare February 21, 2024 08:41
@KochetovNicolai KochetovNicolai added pr-must-backport Pull request should be backported intentionally. Use this label with great care! pr-must-backport-cloud labels Feb 21, 2024
@KochetovNicolai
Copy link
Member

test_backup_restore_s3/test.py::test_user_specific_auth is flaky

test_replicated_database/test.py::test_startup_without_zk is flaky

test_replicated_table_attach/test.py::test_startup_with_small_bg_pool_partitioned is flaky

00984_parser_stack_overflow is flaky

@KochetovNicolai KochetovNicolai merged commit c3f925d into ClickHouse:master Feb 22, 2024
234 of 267 checks passed
robot-clickhouse added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2024
…b3765c03a2196b0fcb02ac97be39b

Cherry pick #60164 to 23.8: Copy S3 file GCP fallback to buffer copy
robot-clickhouse added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2024
…eb3765c03a2196b0fcb02ac97be39b

Cherry pick #60164 to 23.11: Copy S3 file GCP fallback to buffer copy
robot-clickhouse added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2024
…eb3765c03a2196b0fcb02ac97be39b

Cherry pick #60164 to 23.12: Copy S3 file GCP fallback to buffer copy
robot-clickhouse added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2024
…b3765c03a2196b0fcb02ac97be39b

Cherry pick #60164 to 24.1: Copy S3 file GCP fallback to buffer copy
@robot-clickhouse robot-clickhouse added the pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore label Feb 22, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll2 robot-ch-test-poll2 added the pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo label Feb 22, 2024
robot-ch-test-poll2 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
Backport #60164 to 23.12: Copy S3 file GCP fallback to buffer copy
robot-clickhouse-ci-1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
Backport #60164 to 24.1: Copy S3 file GCP fallback to buffer copy
robot-clickhouse-ci-2 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
Backport #60164 to 23.11: Copy S3 file GCP fallback to buffer copy
alexey-milovidov added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 29, 2024
Backport #60164 to 23.8: Copy S3 file GCP fallback to buffer copy
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore pr-backports-created-cloud pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements pr-must-backport Pull request should be backported intentionally. Use this label with great care! pr-must-backport-cloud pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants