Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix addDays cause an error when used datetime64 #61561

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Mar 21, 2024

Conversation

loneylee
Copy link
Contributor

@loneylee loneylee commented Mar 19, 2024

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Bug Fix (user-visible misbehavior in an official stable release)

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Fix the issue where the function addDays (and similar functions) reports an error when the first parameter is DateTime64.

DB::Exception: Illegal type DateTime64(6) of first argument of function addDays. Must be a DateTime: While processing addDays(toDateTime64('2024-01-01', 6), 10, 'Asia/Shanghai')

Documentation entry for user-facing changes

  • Documentation is written (mandatory for new features)

Not needed.

@antaljanosbenjamin antaljanosbenjamin self-assigned this Mar 19, 2024
@antaljanosbenjamin antaljanosbenjamin added the can be tested Allows running workflows for external contributors label Mar 19, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll4 robot-ch-test-poll4 added the pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default label Mar 19, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll4
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll4 commented Mar 19, 2024

This is an automated comment for commit 1f75513 with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Check nameDescriptionStatus
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help❌ failure
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR⏳ pending
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors❌ failure
Successful checks
Check nameDescriptionStatus
A SyncThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
Bugfix validationChecks that either a new test (functional or integration) or there some changed tests that fail with the binary built on master branch✅ success
ClickBenchRuns [ClickBench](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/) with instant-attach table✅ success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process✅ success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Docker keeper imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docker server imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docs checkBuilds and tests the documentation✅ success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here✅ success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc✅ success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment✅ success
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful✅ success
PR CheckThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Style checkRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report✅ success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types✅ success
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts✅ success

@antaljanosbenjamin antaljanosbenjamin merged commit 48cb228 into ClickHouse:master Mar 21, 2024
229 of 234 checks passed
@robot-ch-test-poll3 robot-ch-test-poll3 added the pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo label Mar 21, 2024
@antaljanosbenjamin antaljanosbenjamin added pr-must-backport Pull request should be backported intentionally. Use this label with great care! pr-must-backport-cloud labels Mar 21, 2024
@loneylee loneylee deleted the adddays branch March 22, 2024 02:06
robot-ch-test-poll4 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2024
…8b1f77c9ec10ce04107edec3e190c

Cherry pick #61561 to 23.3: Fix addDays cause an error when used datetime64
antaljanosbenjamin added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2024
Backport #61561 to 23.3: Fix addDays cause an error when used datetime64
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
can be tested Allows running workflows for external contributors pr-backports-created-cloud pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default pr-must-backport Pull request should be backported intentionally. Use this label with great care! pr-must-backport-cloud pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants