Incomplete BSD License File

[WPCTW]

New Issue Checklist

• I have read and understood the CONTRIBUTING guide
• I have read the Documentation or CocoaDocs
• I have searched for a similar issue in the project and found none

Issue Info

Info	Value
Platform Name	e.g. ios / osx / tvos / watchos
Platform Version	e.g. 8.0
CocoaLumberjack Version	e.g. 2.3.0
Integration Method	e.g. carthage / cocoapods / manually
Xcode Version	e.g. Xcode 7.3
Repro rate	e.g. all the time (100%) / sometimes x% / only once
Demo project link	e.g. link to a demo project that highlights the issue

Issue Description and Steps

Please fill in the detailed description of the issue (full output of any stack trace, compiler error, ...) and the steps to reproduce the issue.

Please check the License file, because the License does not include full text of BSD license.
If this project applies to BSD license, it normally would be BSD 2-Clause license or BSD 3-Clause license.
Please refer to the following links:

1. BSD 2-Clause License (https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause)
2. BSD 3-Clause License (https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause)

[pombredanne]

This is a rare, franken license that consists of the first and 3rd clause of the BSD 3 clause
I track this in scancode as the "mentalis" license.

https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/blob/develop/src/licensedcode/data/licenses/mentalis.LICENSE

It is misleading to name this a BSD license as this is a rare bird indeed.

[bpoplauschi]

@WPCTW @pombredanne thanks for your input guys. I have created #942, going to a full BSD 3-Clause License. I'm waiting for a review from @robbiehanson

[bpoplauschi]

@pombredanne Thanks a lot for showing interest and contributing to CocoaLumberjack! Even tough it’s been a while, we would like to invite you to become a maintainer – no pressure to accept! You can pitch in with what seems comfortable: comment on open issues/PRs, triage, improve documentation, write your own PRs. See a broader discussion here #941. Let me know if you are interested.

[pombredanne]

@bpoplauschi thank you for the offer, but I would be grossly under qualified to be a maintainer on this codebase, so I will have to pass.

[bpoplauschi]

@pombredanne that ok, thanks for responding :) good luck with your work