Include Subspecs in search results with --subspecs

[D1plo1d]

Given that we need to install subspecs for RestKit it would be nice to have those subspecs show up in the search results under Restkit perhaps via a subspecs option.

Current Functionality

$ pod search restkit

==> RestKit (0.9.3)
    RestKit is a framework for consuming and modeling RESTful web resources on iOS and OS X.

Feature Request / Expected Functionality

$ pod search restkit --subspecs

==> RestKit (0.9.3)
    RestKit is a framework for consuming and modeling RESTful web resources on iOS and OS X.'

    Sub Specs:
    - RestKit/Network
    - RestKit/ObjectMapping
    - RestKit/ObjectMapping/JSONKit
    - RestKit/ObjectMapping/XML
    - RestKit/ObjectMapping/CoreData

Oh and if anyone knows why pod install wouldn't be able to find the RestKit CoreData subspec ( dependency 'RestKit/ObjectMapping/CoreData' ) I am bashing my head against that atm and would appreciate any hints in the direction of a fix (this feature request is a product of that particular PEBKAC I'm experiencing atm).

Edit I figured out that CoreData is a very recent addition to the RestKit spec (ie. > 0.5.1 which I currently have installed). Ugh..
2nd Edit no wait.. thats the Specs repo.. it should be up to date locally.. umm.. wut??

[alloy]

Good suggestion! I have also created a ticket about it for cocoapods.org.

[alloy]

Regarding your issue with RestKit/ObjectMapping/CoreData, is your spec repo up-to-date? I.e. do you see the subspec in ~/.cocoapods/master/RestKit/0.9.3/RestKit.podspec? And what's the output of running pod install --verbose?

[alloy]

@yas375 Do you feel like tackling this one too?

[alloy]

However, let's leave the --subspecs option away for now and just always include sub specs, there aren't that many yet.

[alloy]

This code should move into the Specification class.

[yas375]

Ok, I'll do this next few days)
thanks for tip ;)

[fabiopelosin]

@yas375 Hey as I've refactored the search command I just wanted to point out that I think set_present.rb#L36 is a good place for this feature. By the way, if you manage to come up with a better name for the module, please change it :-)