[Specs] Adopt subject convention

[fabiopelosin]

The system under test should be referenced by the sut acronym instead of using different names. This convention is concise and simplifies refactors.

For example @set should be changed to @sut in this line

[alloy]

What is ‘sut’ ? Do you mean ‘subject’ ?

[fabiopelosin]

System Under Test

I learned in a screencast of qualitycoding.org and immediately fell in love with the concept. Around CP it is already used but not consistently in all the specs.

[alloy]

I hate acronyms. Exactly because it means that others won’t know what it means, like I did :)

Can we use the unambiguous term ‘subject’ please? (It’s used in other testing frameworks and stems from Test Subject in e.g. clinical trials.)

[fabiopelosin]

subject is fine for me, I'm just looking to standardise tests so they can be moved easily when code is factored out.

[alloy]

Yeah I agree, that’s a good thing.

[fabiopelosin]

Closing because it looks like that sut/subject are not getting much love from the rest of the team.

[alloy]

In fact, it’s outright hate! 😈

[fabiopelosin]

lol