Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved handling of Semver pre-release versions #350

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 11, 2016

Conversation

benasher44
Copy link
Member

@benasher44 benasher44 commented Aug 9, 2016

Fixes CocoaPods/CocoaPods#5718

  • Handle special case of missing first segment of pre-release segments (doesn't mean it wasn't handled before, just calling out this part in the diff)
  • Updated according to Semver's predence spec (item 11 if it doesn't link you straight there):

Numeric identifiers always have lower precedence than non-numeric identifiers.

@segiddins
Copy link
Member

amazing ❤️

:shipit: with a CHANGELOG

@benasher44
Copy link
Member Author

@segiddins what's the difference between Pod::Version and Pod::Vendor::Version? Should I add test cases for that one as well?

@segiddins
Copy link
Member

@benasher44 Pod::Version is a subclass of the vendored RubyGems implementation, so that's not necessary :)

@benasher44
Copy link
Member Author

👍

@benasher44
Copy link
Member Author

@segiddins wait no I'm still confused. Pod::Version inherits from Pod::Vendor::Gem::Version, and Pod::Vendor::Gem::Version also implmements <=>. Pod::Vendor::Gem::Version's implementation of <=> looks how Pod::Version's used to look, so it should be prone to the same bug no?

@segiddins
Copy link
Member

but Pod::Vendor::Gem::Version is never used directly, only via Pod::Version

@benasher44
Copy link
Member Author

benasher44 commented Aug 9, 2016

Huh so it's not. Looks like we only ever refer to Gem::Version (Pod::Version aside). Any reason not to collapse Pod::Vendor::Gem::Version into Pod::Version?

@segiddins
Copy link
Member

To make it easier to merge in changes from upstream

@benasher44
Copy link
Member Author

OH! This is just a clone of Gem::Version. Welp. This all makes sense now. Thanks!

@segiddins
Copy link
Member

🚢

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants