-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stepped solar feed in tariffs in Energy #520
Comments
Summary of issue:
Option 1 - Do NothingUse the Option 2 - Update
|
As discussed in MI call, it would be appreciated if the DSB could consider bundling changes to endpoints together such that energy sector is only incrementing endpoint versions once between the Retail and C&I go-lives. |
This would be a very welcome change. Some plan documents (https://cdr.energymadeeasy.gov.au/simply-energy/cds-au/v1/energy/plans/SIM403916MR@VEC) have a single solarFeedInTariff entry to represent stepped pricing, and only mention the step amounts in the description field. Others (https://cdr.energymadeeasy.gov.au/agl/cds-au/v1/energy/plans/AGL15273MRE17@EME) at least provide separate entries, but still rely on parsing the |
Option 2 of proposed solution has been updated with an FDO date of 15th May 2023 based on this feedback. |
Does this mean we also have to wait 6 months for any other fixes? e.g. AmountString values being rounded to two decimal places (sometimes resulting in non-zero values being rounded to 0.00), |
@garychapman, the future date obligation (FDO) date mentioned in the above comment relates to option 2 and would be applicable for only for that change if it is adopted after consultation. The other issues you have mentioned are not in the scope of this change request (CR). If you would like these issues to be considered for the next maintenance iteration you can recommend them during the backlog grooming. We usually consider FDOs for breaking changes to the standards, this helps impacted participants plan accordingly for when that specific change will take effect. The date itself would depend on various factors (for e.g. size/scope of change and impact) and is usually discussed during the consultation of the issue. |
Biza's feedback having consulted with Energy customers indicates broad support for Option 2 - especially moving away from the use of the description field for describing stepped rates. |
During the last call for MI 13, participants requested more time to review the proposed options. As a result this CR will be carried over to Maintenance Iteration 14. |
Sorry to respond pretty late on this, but has seasonality been considered for FiT? |
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on this proposed change. AGL supports the adoption of this change. We note that at the time of writing, AGL has no customers registered for CDR that are currently impacted by solar stepped tariffs. |
The DSB discussed the feedback in this comment #520 (comment) was discussed with @DannyDuong as per the action noted in MI14 meeting on February 22nd. Below is the summary of the discussion:
The above recommended option is reflected in a updated Option 2. Any feedback on if the inclusion of the optional dates fields is welcome. |
@AGL-CDR thank you for your feedback. Note that the tranche 2 date is 15th May 2023 which is currently proposed for option 2. Did you mean tranche 3? Feedback from participants during the previous MI call indicated the tranche 2 date of 15th May 2023 is not feasible. As a result, the DSB recommends the FDO date of 1st November 2023 which aligns with tranche 3 release for the energy sector. Option 2 has been updated with this new date. |
Hello again @CDR-API-Stream , thank you for providing an updated FDO in line with November 2023. Apologies for the confusion caused on tranche delineation, the date put forward relates to our internal release schedules as defined and outlined in the Exemption Register. |
This issue has been staged and can be viewed here: ConsumerDataStandardsAustralia/standards-staging@ca1b57a. It will be incorporated into 1.24.0 release of the standards as part of MI14 changes. Notes:
|
Description
During consultation on issue #472, the question of representation of stepped solar feed in tariffs in Energy APIs was raised.
This issue is raised to consult on if/how stepped solar feed in tariffs should be represented in EnergyPlanSolarFeedInTariff.
Area Affected
Change Proposed
This decision proposal is currently a placeholder. The DSB will publish recommended changes to be consulted on within the Maintenance Iteration it gets prioritised for.
DSB Proposed Solution
The current DSB proposal for this issue is in this comment. Note The comment was updated on 14th October 2022 with a "Do Nothing" option
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: