Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stepped solar feed in tariffs in Energy #520

Closed
CDR-API-Stream opened this issue Jun 7, 2022 · 14 comments
Closed

Stepped solar feed in tariffs in Energy #520

CDR-API-Stream opened this issue Jun 7, 2022 · 14 comments
Labels
Energy Proposal made The DSB has proposed a specific change to the standards to address the change request

Comments

@CDR-API-Stream
Copy link
Collaborator

CDR-API-Stream commented Jun 7, 2022

Description

During consultation on issue #472, the question of representation of stepped solar feed in tariffs in Energy APIs was raised.

This issue is raised to consult on if/how stepped solar feed in tariffs should be represented in EnergyPlanSolarFeedInTariff.

Area Affected

Change Proposed

This decision proposal is currently a placeholder. The DSB will publish recommended changes to be consulted on within the Maintenance Iteration it gets prioritised for.

DSB Proposed Solution

The current DSB proposal for this issue is in this comment. Note The comment was updated on 14th October 2022 with a "Do Nothing" option

@CDR-API-Stream
Copy link
Collaborator Author

CDR-API-Stream commented Aug 26, 2022

Summary of issue:

Option 1 - Do Nothing

Use the description field in EnergyPlanSolarFeedInTariff structure to described the stepped rates. Multiple entries can be provided (one per stepped rate) as EnergyPlanSolarFeedInTariff structure is an array.

Option 2 - Update EnergyPlanSolarFeedInTariff with rates object

The EnergyPlanSolarFeedInTariff schema can be updated with the rates object used in other parts of energy standards such as EnergyPlanTariffPeriod. The volume field in the rates object could then be used to specify the volume of usage a particular rate applies to.

03/03/2023 Update The option is updated with optional startDate and endDate fields to accommodate seasonal rates as per the feedback in this comment.

The change would like as below:

"solarFeedInTariff": [
    {
      "displayName": "string",
      "description": "string",
      "startDate": "DateString", // Optional start date of the application of the feed in tariff 
      "endDate": "DateString", // Optional end date of the application of the feed in tariff 
      "scheme": "PREMIUM",
      "payerType": "GOVERNMENT",
      "tariffUType": "singleTariff",
      "singleTariff": {
        "rates": [ // mandatory - Array of rates
            {
              "unitPrice": "string", // mandatory- Unit price of usage per measure unit (exclusive of GST)
              "measureUnit": [ "KWH", "KVA", "KVAR", "KVARH", "KW", "DAYS", "METER", "MONTH" ], // optional - The measurement unit of rate. Assumed to be KWH if absent
              "volume": 0 // optional - Volume that this rate applies to. Only applicable for ‘stepped’ rates where different rates apply for different volumes in a period
            }
          ],
      },
      "timeVaryingTariffs": {
        "type": "PEAK",
        "rates": [ // mandatory - Array of rates
            {
              "unitPrice": "string", // mandatory- Unit price of usage per measure unit (exclusive of GST)
              "measureUnit": [ "KWH", "KVA", "KVAR", "KVARH", "KW", "DAYS", "METER", "MONTH" ], // optional - The measurement unit of rate. Assumed to be KWH if absent
              "volume": 0 // optional - Volume that this rate applies to. Only applicable for ‘stepped’ rates where different rates apply for different volumes in a period
            }
          ],
        "timeVariations": [
          {
            "days": [
              "SUN"
            ],
            "startTime": "string",
            "endTime": "string"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  ]

FDO

  • Any material change approved as part of this CR will not be implemented for November 15th 2022 energy go live and will have a future dated obligation date (FDO).
    - The DSB proposes a FDO date of 07/04/2023 from the obligation date schedule
    - Based on feedback, the proposed FDO date is now 15th May 2023 in alignment to tranche 2 release of energy sector.
  • Based on feedback during MI call on 8th March, the proposed FDO date is now 1st November 2023 in alignment to tranche 3 release of energy sector

Feedback on the solution options and FDO date is welcome.

@CDR-API-Stream CDR-API-Stream added the Proposal made The DSB has proposed a specific change to the standards to address the change request label Aug 26, 2022
@CDR-API-Stream CDR-API-Stream moved this from Iteration Candidates to In Progress: Design in Data Standards Maintenance Sep 7, 2022
@CDR-API-Stream CDR-API-Stream moved this from In Progress: Design to Iteration Candidates in Data Standards Maintenance Oct 4, 2022
@CDR-API-Stream CDR-API-Stream moved this from Iteration Candidates to In Progress: Staging in Data Standards Maintenance Oct 5, 2022
@CDR-API-Stream CDR-API-Stream moved this from In Progress: Staging to Iteration Candidates in Data Standards Maintenance Oct 5, 2022
@perlboy
Copy link

perlboy commented Oct 12, 2022

As discussed in MI call, it would be appreciated if the DSB could consider bundling changes to endpoints together such that energy sector is only incrementing endpoint versions once between the Retail and C&I go-lives.

@garychapman
Copy link

This would be a very welcome change. Some plan documents (https://cdr.energymadeeasy.gov.au/simply-energy/cds-au/v1/energy/plans/SIM403916MR@VEC) have a single solarFeedInTariff entry to represent stepped pricing, and only mention the step amounts in the description field. Others (https://cdr.energymadeeasy.gov.au/agl/cds-au/v1/energy/plans/AGL15273MRE17@EME) at least provide separate entries, but still rely on parsing the description field to determine the volumes.

@CDR-API-Stream
Copy link
Collaborator Author

As discussed in MI call, it would be appreciated if the DSB could consider bundling changes to endpoints together such that energy sector is only incrementing endpoint versions once between the Retail and C&I go-lives.

Option 2 of proposed solution has been updated with an FDO date of 15th May 2023 based on this feedback.

@garychapman
Copy link

Does this mean we also have to wait 6 months for any other fixes? e.g. AmountString values being rounded to two decimal places (sometimes resulting in non-zero values being rounded to 0.00), greenPowerCharges.tiers.amount values missing entirely from some plan documents, etc.

@CDR-API-Stream
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@garychapman, the future date obligation (FDO) date mentioned in the above comment relates to option 2 and would be applicable for only for that change if it is adopted after consultation. The other issues you have mentioned are not in the scope of this change request (CR). If you would like these issues to be considered for the next maintenance iteration you can recommend them during the backlog grooming.

We usually consider FDOs for breaking changes to the standards, this helps impacted participants plan accordingly for when that specific change will take effect. The date itself would depend on various factors (for e.g. size/scope of change and impact) and is usually discussed during the consultation of the issue.

@CDR-API-Stream CDR-API-Stream moved this from Iteration Candidates to In Progress: Design in Data Standards Maintenance Nov 22, 2022
@rob-hale
Copy link

rob-hale commented Dec 9, 2022

Biza's feedback having consulted with Energy customers indicates broad support for Option 2 - especially moving away from the use of the description field for describing stepped rates.
Although not an immediate pressing need, the ability to accommodate and reflect stepped rates that have a temporal dimension to them could be required. For example, feed-in tariffs on specified days of the week may indeed vary. It appears that the proposed option 2 could accommodate these through timeVariations

@JamesMBligh JamesMBligh moved this from In Progress: Design to In Progress: Staging in Data Standards Maintenance Dec 14, 2022
@CDR-API-Stream
Copy link
Collaborator Author

During the last call for MI 13, participants requested more time to review the proposed options. As a result this CR will be carried over to Maintenance Iteration 14.

@CDR-API-Stream CDR-API-Stream moved this from In Progress: Staging to Iteration Candidates in Data Standards Maintenance Jan 18, 2023
@DannyDuong
Copy link

Sorry to respond pretty late on this, but has seasonality been considered for FiT?
Given that we have to deal with step rates, time variance - any chance that seasonality needs to be considered as a future proofing item?

@AGL-CDR
Copy link

AGL-CDR commented Mar 1, 2023

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on this proposed change. AGL supports the adoption of this change. We note that at the time of writing, AGL has no customers registered for CDR that are currently impacted by solar stepped tariffs.
Our preference is that these optional fields become a future dated obligation (FDO) on 15th November 2023 aligning to our next deployment of Tranche 2.

@CDR-API-Stream
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The DSB discussed the feedback in this comment #520 (comment) was discussed with @DannyDuong as per the action noted in MI14 meeting on February 22nd. Below is the summary of the discussion:

  • The feedback suggests updating the proposed EnergyPlanSolarFeedInTariff structure to accommodate seasonal Feed in Tariffs (FiT) that can be seasonal (i.e. different solar feed in tariffs based on the time of the year).
  • An option would be to include optional startDate and endDate fields (similar to how EnergyPlanTariffPeriod). This would allow specifying feed in tariffs that can change based on dates/seasons

The above recommended option is reflected in a updated Option 2. Any feedback on if the inclusion of the optional dates fields is welcome.

@CDR-API-Stream
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@AGL-CDR thank you for your feedback. Note that the tranche 2 date is 15th May 2023 which is currently proposed for option 2. Did you mean tranche 3?

Feedback from participants during the previous MI call indicated the tranche 2 date of 15th May 2023 is not feasible. As a result, the DSB recommends the FDO date of 1st November 2023 which aligns with tranche 3 release for the energy sector. Option 2 has been updated with this new date.

@AGL-CDR
Copy link

AGL-CDR commented Mar 22, 2023

@AGL-CDR thank you for your feedback. Note that the tranche 2 date is 15th May 2023 which is currently proposed for option 2. Did you mean tranche 3?

Feedback from participants during the previous MI call indicated the tranche 2 date of 15th May 2023 is not feasible. As a result, the DSB recommends the FDO date of 1st November 2023 which aligns with tranche 3 release for the energy sector. Option 2 has been updated with this new date.

Hello again @CDR-API-Stream , thank you for providing an updated FDO in line with November 2023. Apologies for the confusion caused on tranche delineation, the date put forward relates to our internal release schedules as defined and outlined in the Exemption Register.

@CDR-API-Stream
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This issue has been staged and can be viewed here: ConsumerDataStandardsAustralia/standards-staging@ca1b57a. It will be incorporated into 1.24.0 release of the standards as part of MI14 changes.

Notes:

  • The Get Energy Account Detail and Get Generic Plan Detail APIs have had a version increment as a result of this change.
  • As per feedback during consultation, the FDO for implementing the new versions is set to 1st November 2023 in alignment to tranche 3 release of energy sector.
  • The date for decommissioning the older versions has been set to 9th September 2024 (Y24 # 4 date as per the obligation date schedule) giving ADRs and DHs sufficient time to transition. Participants are welcome to raise a CR if there are any concerns with this date.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Energy Proposal made The DSB has proposed a specific change to the standards to address the change request
Projects
Status: Done
Data Standards Maintenance
  
Iteration Candidates
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants