Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade rubocop from 1.63.5 to 1.64.0 #723

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ccs-snyk
Copy link

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the rubygems dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • Gemfile
⚠️ Warning ``` Failed to update the Gemfile.lock, please update manually before merging. ```

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
SNYK-RUBY-REXML-6861566
  49  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-REXML-6861566
@tim-s-ccs tim-s-ccs closed this Jun 12, 2024
@tim-s-ccs tim-s-ccs deleted the snyk-fix-9ba8adeb2dc122459f1428a54d55b372 branch July 2, 2024 07:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants