Support for FunctionalChainInvolvement context and exchanged items #94
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Wuestengecko
reviewed
Jun 3, 2022
Open
ewuerger
force-pushed
the
functional-chain-involvment-context
branch
from
d56a06b
to
1e80834
Compare
…ional-chain-involvment-context
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes #92. In doing so we deleted the
involvedattribute on theOperationalProcessand made it inheriting fromfa.FunctionalChain(look here). Theinvolvedattribute comes from the super class.This is solely to stay dry when implementing functionality of FunctionalChains/OperationalProcesses.