Feature/ActionsModal refactor

[MiltonTulli]

Description

ActionsModal refactor

• file/folder structure
• translation
• Basic snapshot test.

Closes #848

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce.

Checklist:

• My code follows the existing style of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any UI changes have been tested and made responsive for mobile views

[github-actions]

✔️ Preview deployment is ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 13f5ea1

😎 Browse the preview: https://bafybeifgecfcakmxr32k7cldyiyzlkooacsjrflr2upmqulxvhd7yvmujy.ipfs.dweb.link

[github-actions]

✔️ Preview deployment is ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 43ed33b

😎 Browse the preview: https://bafybeifgecfcakmxr32k7cldyiyzlkooacsjrflr2upmqulxvhd7yvmujy.ipfs.dweb.link

[rossneilson]

Can we add this back in

[MiltonTulli]

This file is autogenerated by scripts/updateDeployedBytecodes after each yarn install. Something must change in dxdao contracts for this to be removed. The reason must be that script couldn't find the json inside artifacts.

[rossneilson]

I get why we have this, its nice for imports, but we should decide if we are making this standard and then we can use it everywhere.
Also I am not sure we need that extra components folder in ActionModal folder, we can just have folders for the individual components to make it flatter