Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[duplicate] bad translucent texture depth on rsmse map #121

Closed
illwieckz opened this issue Aug 28, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

[duplicate] bad translucent texture depth on rsmse map #121

illwieckz opened this issue Aug 28, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
A-Renderer S-Duplicate T-Bug
Projects
Unvanquished

Comments

@illwieckz
Copy link
Member

illwieckz commented Aug 28, 2018 •
edited
Loading

This is an issue similar to #120 (broken water translucency on station15 map) except the translucency is not faulty opaque, only the depth issue is visible. It also occurs on translucent textures too.

incorrect

incorrect

incorrect

incorrect

If I remember correctly the depth is correct when normalmaps are disabled.
@illwieckz
Copy link
Member Author

illwieckz commented Aug 28, 2018 •
edited
Loading

For testing purpose a snapshot of rsmse map built for for-0.51.0 branch is available there:
https://gg.illwieckz.net/dl/unvanquished/dev/

@illwieckz illwieckz added this to To do in Unvanquished Oct 24, 2018
@illwieckz
Copy link
Member Author

hmmmmmm, I already reported this issue in #77

Unvanquished automation moved this from To do to Done Nov 12, 2018
@illwieckz illwieckz changed the title bad translucent texture depth on rsmse map bad translucent texture depth on rsmse map [duplicate] Nov 12, 2018
@illwieckz illwieckz changed the title bad translucent texture depth on rsmse map [duplicate] [duplicate] bad translucent texture depth on rsmse map Nov 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-Renderer S-Duplicate T-Bug
Projects
Unvanquished
Status: Done
Unvanquished
  
Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@t4im @illwieckz