You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, very useful tool!
I wonder if the ratio of cell types in the input data is needed to maintain their true biological fraction, or just a certain number of cells is enough?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thank you for your interest in our tool. BayesPrism does not take the cell
type fraction from the scRNA-seq reference into consideration. We only
recommend having a sufficient number of cells >20 or 50 for each cell type
when generating the reference.
Best,
Tinyi
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 9:12 PM Chaosli98 ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi, very useful tool!
I wonder if the ratio of cell types in the input data is needed to
maintain their true biological fraction, or just a certain number of cells
is enough?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4NHSZRSZNE6FIIBRGBQHTV5E4O7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAQHIEBC4>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
Hi, very useful tool!
I wonder if the ratio of cell types in the input data is needed to maintain their true biological fraction, or just a certain number of cells is enough?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: