Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix step name #1905

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2024
Merged

Fix step name #1905

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

antonio-ramadas-dd
Copy link
Contributor

Follow up to #1901 because I misspelled the name of the step. It's defined here:

@then(parsers.parse('the response "{response_path}" does not have field "{field}"'))
def expect_response_does_not_have_field(context, response_path, field):
"""Check that a response path does not have field."""

Review checklist

Please check relevant items below:

  • This PR includes all newly recorded cassettes for any modified tests.

  • This PR does not rely on API client schema changes.

    • The CI should be fully passing.
  • Or, this PR relies on API schema changes and this is a Draft PR to include tests for that new functionality.

    • Note: CI shouldn't be run on this Draft PR, as its expected to fail without the corresponding schema changes.

@antonio-ramadas-dd antonio-ramadas-dd requested a review from a team as a code owner March 12, 2024 14:24
@skarimo skarimo merged commit d786bcf into master Mar 12, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
@skarimo skarimo deleted the antonio.ramadas/fix-typo branch March 12, 2024 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants