Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(tracing): fix traceback max size for exceptions [backport 2.7] #9389

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 28, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot commented May 24, 2024

Backport 1b954de from #9112 to 2.7.

#7558 made the traceback size configurable via DD_TRACE_SPAN_TRACEBACK_MAX_SIZE, but tracebacks for exceptions were still hardcoded with a limit of 30.

The fix is modeled after Span#set_traceback's existing logic, and tests were modeled after both test_traceback_with_error and test_custom_traceback_size. Not much new logic, just an edge case.

Checklist

  • Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description
  • Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR
  • Risks are described (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability)
  • Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
  • Library release note guidelines are followed or label changelog/no-changelog is set
  • Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, public corp docs)
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)
  • If this PR changes the public interface, I've notified @DataDog/apm-tees.

Reviewer Checklist

  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Description motivates each change
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • Author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

#7558 made the traceback size
configurable via `DD_SPAN_TRACEBACK_MAX_SIZE`, but tracebacks for
exceptions were still hardcoded with a limit of 30.

The fix is modeled after `Span#set_traceback`'s existing logic, and
tests were modeled after both `test_traceback_with_error` and
`test_custom_traceback_size`. Not much new logic, just an edge case.

## Checklist

- [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description
- [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included
in the PR
- [x] Risks are described (performance impact, potential for breakage,
maintainability)
- [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
- [x] [Library release note
guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html)
are followed or label `changelog/no-changelog` is set
- [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public
corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/))
- [x] Backport labels are set (if
[applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting))
- [x] If this PR changes the public interface, I've notified
`@DataDog/apm-tees`.

## Reviewer Checklist

- [x] Title is accurate
- [x] All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
- [x] Description motivates each change
- [x] Avoids breaking
[API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces)
changes
- [x] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
- [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
- [x] Release note makes sense to a user of the library
- [x] Author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications
of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
- [x] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the
[release branch maintenance
policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)

Co-authored-by: erikayasuda <153395705+erikayasuda@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1b954de)
@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn bot commented May 24, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: backport-9112-to-2.7
Commit report: f6aef76
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 81340 Passed, 30077 Skipped, 25m 10.21s Total duration (1h 41m 19.57s time saved)

@erikayasuda erikayasuda enabled auto-merge (squash) May 24, 2024 23:02
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented May 24, 2024

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-05-24 23:28:48

Comparing candidate commit ec338ea in PR branch backport-9112-to-2.7 with baseline commit ed6ea55 in branch 2.7.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 201 metrics, 9 unstable metrics.

@erikayasuda erikayasuda merged commit 965e62d into 2.7 May 28, 2024
157 of 182 checks passed
@erikayasuda erikayasuda deleted the backport-9112-to-2.7 branch May 28, 2024 15:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants