chore(iast): redaction algorithms refactor II [backport 2.9] #9509
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
# Summarize Refactor of the IAST redaction system. The old algorithms had several problems: ## Description This PR continues this #9126 - Migrate SQL Injection to this new algorithm - Remove deprecated code ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR - [x] Risks are described (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability) - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation) - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed or label `changelog/no-changelog` is set - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)) - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) - [x] If this PR changes the public interface, I've notified `@DataDog/apm-tees`. - [x] If change touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from `@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance`. ## Reviewer Checklist - [ ] Title is accurate - [ ] All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - [ ] Description motivates each change - [ ] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation) - [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library - [ ] Author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) (cherry picked from commit 8d67869)
github-actions
bot
added
changelog/no-changelog
gnufede
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2024
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 110844 Passed, 5747 Skipped, 36m 24.79s Total duration (24m 47.41s time saved) |
erikayasuda
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2024
18 tasks
|
Blocked by #9517 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport 8d67869 from #9163 to 2.9.
Summarize
Refactor of the IAST redaction system. The old algorithms had several problems:
Description
This PR continues this #9126
Checklist
changelog/no-changelogis set@DataDog/apm-tees.@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance.Reviewer Checklist