First version of helper for creating logs saved views

[iliakur]

What does this PR do?

First take on a script to create saved views. Was used for the following 2 PRs:

• Add saved views for Flux #17351
• Add Saved Views for Argo Workflows #17352

Motivation

Too much manual work without a script.

Additional Notes

The part that worries me is that there's no clear definition of what a saved view asset should look like.
I based my manipulations on examples and feedback from validations, but it would be nice to find an actual schema.

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

• Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
• Changelog entries must be created for modifications to shipped code
• Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
• If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 24 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.69%. Comparing base (21d0d70) to head (a8213cc).
Report is 130 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Flag	Coverage Δ
activemq	?
btrfs	82.91% <ø> (ø)
cassandra	?
cassandra_nodetool	93.16% <ø> (ø)
ceph	91.07% <ø> (ø)
cilium	77.72% <ø> (+0.87%)	⬆️
clickhouse	95.65% <ø> (ø)
cloudera	99.49% <ø> (ø)
confluent_platform	?
coredns	94.61% <ø> (ø)
couchbase	85.26% <ø> (+0.36%)	⬆️
datadog_checks_downloader	81.40% <ø> (ø)
ddev	88.17% <33.33%> (-0.22%)	⬇️
dns_check	93.33% <ø> (ø)
eks_fargate	94.05% <ø> (ø)
elastic	93.36% <ø> (ø)
envoy	95.34% <ø> (+0.48%)	⬆️
etcd	95.56% <ø> (ø)
external_dns	89.28% <ø> (ø)
foundationdb	83.83% <ø> (ø)
gearmand	78.26% <ø> (+1.24%)	⬆️
gitlab	91.95% <ø> (+1.00%)	⬆️
go_expvar	92.73% <ø> (ø)
haproxy	95.13% <ø> (+0.16%)	⬆️
harbor	89.65% <ø> (ø)
hazelcast	92.39% <ø> (ø)
hdfs_datanode	89.74% <ø> (ø)
hdfs_namenode	86.72% <ø> (ø)
hive	?
hivemq	?
http_check	95.32% <ø> (+2.02%)	⬆️
hudi	?
ibm_ace	92.25% <ø> (ø)
ibm_mq	91.28% <ø> (ø)
ignite	?
jboss_wildfly	?
kafka	?
kafka_consumer	93.07% <ø> (ø)
kong	87.62% <ø> (ø)
kube_dns	95.97% <ø> (ø)
kubelet	91.01% <ø> (ø)
linkerd	85.22% <ø> (+1.13%)	⬆️
mapreduce	82.12% <ø> (ø)
mesos_master	89.75% <ø> (ø)
mesos_slave	93.33% <ø> (ø)
mongo	96.19% <ø> (?)
mysql	87.81% <ø> (?)
network	93.65% <ø> (+1.08%)	⬆️
nfsstat	95.20% <ø> (ø)
openstack_controller	93.89% <ø> (ø)
oracle	88.33% <ø> (ø)
pdh_check	95.65% <ø> (ø)
php_fpm	90.53% <ø> (+0.82%)	⬆️
postgres	93.07% <ø> (ø)
powerdns_recursor	96.65% <ø> (ø)
presto	?
rabbitmq	95.73% <ø> (ø)
ray	96.45% <ø> (ø)
redisdb	88.07% <ø> (ø)
riak	99.21% <ø> (ø)
riakcs	93.61% <ø> (ø)
sap_hana	91.37% <ø> (ø)
snmp	95.76% <ø> (?)
solr	56.25% <ø> (ø)
sonarqube	98.24% <ø> (ø)
spark	94.14% <ø> (ø)
sqlserver	89.98% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
ssh_check	91.58% <ø> (ø)
statsd	87.36% <ø> (ø)
teradata	94.05% <ø> (ø)
tomcat	60.41% <ø> (?)
varnish	84.39% <ø> (+0.26%)	⬆️
weblogic	71.73% <ø> (ø)
win32_event_log	86.36% <ø> (ø)
windows_performance_counters	98.36% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[github-actions]

Test Results

   853 files     853 suites   5h 54m 22s ⏱️
 6 416 tests  6 227 ✅   188 💤 1 ❌
27 098 runs  22 447 ✅ 4 650 💤 1 ❌

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit a8213cc.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

The validations job has failed; please review the Files changed tab for possible suggestions to resolve.

[HadhemiDD]

LGTM