-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
d3-geo Update to version 1.5 #14756
Comments
@tomwanzek wanted to ping you about this. If modified in d3-geo, do definitions bubble up to the global d3 definitions? Also, I think d3-hierarchy had some minor changes recently (not sure if the API changed though)... |
@Ledragon Until recently, we pinned the definition's minor version for the standard D3 bundle in d3 to the corresponding minor versions of the d3 modules included in the bundle. This was done with a This would imply that after updating the d3-geo definitions to 1.5 and publishing it, we would bump the minor version of the d3 definitions to 4.6. We would also have updated the So this would be a two step process in consecutive PRs. At least, that is how I have done it in the past. Now, recently, to my surprise, I found that the d3 I guess it is time to follow up once more on that. So, to remove any confusion I inadvertently created, when I said in my initial comment under this issue, that d3-geo and d3 minor version could be bumped in the same PR, this is only permissible without the As for the question of "global" d3, if you are referring to the The standalone definitions for d3-geo themselves, do not export to a As for d3-hierarchy, I already made and published the changes up to the latest minor version. |
Okay, thanks for the reply. I see indeed that the As for the 'global' question, yes, I was referring to the re-export |
As of today, 1.6 is out, with the addition of |
I saw it as well, I am tempted to say, let's process this one first so we maintain a version correspondence without gap. Then we do 1.6 as a follow-up PR. Let me go through this one to o.k. it. (Sorry, I had some unexpected "fun" with tensorflow 1.0 on the weekend.) I am prioritizing #14756 for today to push it through. |
Ok, that works for me. |
Alright, finally turned around on my part (see comments in PR). I will tackle the update to d3-geo 1.6 afterwards and let you review. So you can take revenge for my slight delay in getting back to this 😉 |
I updated the PR, thanks for your comments. Hopes it gets merged soon, so that 1.6 can be tackled... |
Thx! |
d3-geo has seen a minor version update to 1.5 adding a new method.
The definitions should be updated to reflect
path.measure(...)
and any other relevant changes since the last version against which d3-geo was validated.The minor version of d3 definitions should also be bumped to 4.6. Could be done in the same PR.
@Ledragon
cc @gustavderdrrache
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: