Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds some admin docs #41063
Adds some admin docs #41063
Changes from 1 commit
85bfc99
57c1638
3e999fe
504a1b7
fb9e2e9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These two paragraphs are a good start, although eventually I'd like to have a bit more about the philosophy — that this isn't a code review in the usual sense, but an assessment of category and severity, followed by delegating to the people who actually know how to review the code. Since the bot tags the PRs with category and owners, it's mainly an exercise in co-ordinating between humans, and filling in any places the bot currently misses.
Also, something about how the sliding scale of package popularity affects reviews. The maintainer should review changes to popular packages, and very popular packages — those with a name you recognise, roughly — should have signoffs from at least two maintainers. Conversely, it's fine to overlook problems with changes to unpopular packages; in many cases only the author is using them anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree - I've expanded it!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
at some point we should have the content of 'oh no modules' in here, plus links to the handbook. for now can you add a list like
strict: true
or equivalent four (five?) settings in tsconfig.jsonesModuleInterop: true
, no matter how temptingAlso maybe link to my slide deck: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Q4xfZSY7d9yHhtxSyb-DE85fTXB38RyF3nnyVyvenwc/edit?usp=sharing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is hard in two ways:
The result is that so far we've told people that the Right Way to consume DT packages is to pin them to an exact major.minor.patch. That's not in the README and it's not common practise, but I think those are the things to change.