fix(pino): remedy destination static method and add missing option prettifier

[emilio-martinez]

Please fill in this template.

• Use a meaningful title for the pull request. Include the name of the package modified.
• Test the change in your own code. (Compile and run.)
• Add or edit tests to reflect the change. (Run with npm test.)
• Follow the advice from the readme.
• Avoid common mistakes.
• Run npm run lint package-name (or tsc if no tslint.json is present).

Select one of these and delete the others:

If changing an existing definition:

• Provide a URL to documentation or source code which provides context for the suggested changes: https://github.com/pinojs/pino/blob/v6.0.0/pino.js#L196
• If this PR brings the type definitions up to date with a new version of the JS library, update the version number in the header.
• Include tests for your changes
• If you are making substantial changes, consider adding a tslint.json containing { "extends": "dtslint/dt.json" }. If for reason the any rule need to be disabled, disable it for that line using // tslint:disable-next-line [ruleName] and not for whole package so that the need for disabling can be reviewed.

PR Summary

• Fixes destination static method parameter to reflect pino’s documentation (https://getpino.io/#/docs/api?id=statics). This parameter should have already been typed this way for the current type version (v6.0.0), so no version change is required. As such, source code linked above refers to that version; no changes have been made to this portion of the API since then.
• Adds missing option prettifier. This was also available in current type version (v6.0.0).

[typescript-bot]

@emilio-martinez Thank you for submitting this PR!

Code Reviews

Because you edited one package and updated the tests (👏), I can help you merge this PR once someone else signs off on it.

Status

• ✅ No merge conflicts
• ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
• ✅ Most recent commit is approved by type definition owners or DT maintainers

All of the items on the list are green. To merge, you need to post a comment including the string "Ready to merge" to bring in your changes.

---

Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR

{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 44642,
  "author": "emilio-martinez",
  "owners": [
    "psnider",
    "BendingBender",
    "screendriver",
    "paambaati",
    "alferpal",
    "mortiy",
    "lummish",
    "raoulus",
    "Cooryd",
    "AdamVig",
    "austin-beer",
    "Pegase745"
  ],
  "dangerLevel": "ScopedAndTested",
  "headCommitAbbrOid": "32d09db",
  "headCommitOid": "32d09dbf6d0fffe2944ccb33f396a86424ddf284",
  "mergeIsRequested": true,
  "stalenessInDays": 0,
  "lastCommitDate": "2020-05-11T12:02:24.000Z",
  "lastCommentDate": "2020-05-11T20:44:40.000Z",
  "reviewLink": "https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/pull/44642/files",
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "authorIsOwner": false,
  "isFirstContribution": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Popular",
  "anyPackageIsNew": false,
  "packages": [
    "pino"
  ],
  "files": [
    {
      "filePath": "types/pino/index.d.ts",
      "kind": "definition",
      "package": "pino"
    },
    {
      "filePath": "types/pino/pino-tests.ts",
      "kind": "test",
      "package": "pino"
    }
  ],
  "hasDismissedReview": false,
  "travisResult": "pass",
  "lastReviewDate": "2020-05-11T20:40:36.000Z",
  "reviewersWithStaleReviews": [],
  "approvalFlags": 2,
  "isChangesRequested": false
}

[typescript-bot]

🔔 @psnider @BendingBender @screendriver @paambaati @alferpal @mortiy @lummish @raoulus @Cooryd @AdamVig @austin-beer @Pegase745 - please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

[typescript-bot]

👋 Hi there! I’ve run some quick measurements against master and your PR. These metrics should help the humans reviewing this PR gauge whether it might negatively affect compile times or editor responsiveness for users who install these typings.

Let’s review the numbers, shall we?

Comparison details 📊

	master	#44642	diff
Batch compilation
Memory usage (MiB)	69.0	69.7	+1.0%
Type count	9752	9807	+1%
Assignability cache size	3249	3292	+1%
Language service
Samples taken	346	390	+13%
Identifiers in tests	346	390	+13%
getCompletionsAtPosition
Mean duration (ms)	269.2	267.6	-0.6%
Mean CV	10.6%	10.5%
Worst duration (ms)	364.3	336.1	-7.7%
Worst identifier	stderr	paths
getQuickInfoAtPosition
Mean duration (ms)	268.1	268.7	+0.2%
Mean CV	10.7%	10.8%	+0.4%
Worst duration (ms)	355.7	321.5	-9.6%
Worst identifier	serverResponse	level

It looks like nothing changed too much. I won’t post performance data again unless it gets worse.

[lummish]

LGTM

[typescript-bot]

@emilio-martinez Everything looks good here. Great job! I am ready to merge this PR on your behalf.

If you'd like that to happen, please post a comment saying:

Ready to merge

and I'll merge this PR almost instantly. Thanks for helping out! ❤️

[emilio-martinez]

Ready to merge

[typescript-bot]

I just published @types/pino@6.0.1 to npm.