fix missing class IllegalOperationError in amqplib

[NinjaKinshasa]

Please fill in this template.

• Use a meaningful title for the pull request. Include the name of the package modified.
• Test the change in your own code. (Compile and run.)
• Add or edit tests to reflect the change.
• Follow the advice from the readme.
• Avoid common mistakes.
• Run pnpm test <package to test>.
• Provide a URL to documentation or source code which provides context for the suggested changes: << https://github.com/amqp-node/amqplib/blob/64d1c1ec19afa64a7ec5c355ea7620f0b227fb30/channel_api.js#L16 >>
• If this PR brings the type definitions up to date with a new version of the JS library, update the version number in the package.json.

[typescript-bot]

@NinjaKinshasa Thank you for submitting this PR! I see this is your first time submitting to DefinitelyTyped 👋 — I'm the local bot who will help you through the process of getting things through.

This is a live comment which I will keep updated.

1 package in this PR

• amqplib — on npm, on unpkg
  • owner-approval: @mnahkies

Code Reviews

This PR can be merged once it's reviewed.

You can test the changes of this PR in the Playground.

Status

• ✅ No merge conflicts
• ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
• ✅ Most recent commit is approved by type definition owners or DT maintainers

All of the items on the list are green. To merge, you need to post a comment including the string "Ready to merge" to bring in your changes.

Inactive

This PR has been inactive for 10 days — please merge or say something if there's a problem, otherwise it will be closed!

---

Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR

{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 69531,
  "author": "NinjaKinshasa",
  "headCommitOid": "6aea29333ba5792d31fcdf69ad4d5d89af17dd6c",
  "mergeBaseOid": "20f1d855d85510c51368984655e4133d520301a2",
  "lastPushDate": "2024-05-06T13:07:44.000Z",
  "lastActivityDate": "2024-05-29T16:36:12.000Z",
  "maintainerBlessed": "Waiting for Code Reviews",
  "mergeOfferDate": "2024-05-29T16:36:14.000Z",
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "isFirstContribution": true,
  "tooManyFiles": false,
  "hugeChange": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Popular",
  "pkgInfo": [
    {
      "name": "amqplib",
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "types/amqplib/index.d.ts",
          "kind": "definition"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [
        "mnahkies",
        "abreits",
        "nfantone",
        "nickzelei",
        "XVincentX",
        "seonggwonyoon"
      ],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Popular"
    }
  ],
  "reviews": [
    {
      "type": "approved",
      "reviewer": "sheetalkamat",
      "date": "2024-05-29T16:36:12.000Z",
      "isMaintainer": true
    },
    {
      "type": "approved",
      "reviewer": "mnahkies",
      "date": "2024-05-17T19:33:23.000Z",
      "isMaintainer": false
    }
  ],
  "mainBotCommentID": 2095981406,
  "ciResult": "pass"
}

[typescript-bot]

Hey @NinjaKinshasa,

😒 Your PR doesn't modify any tests, so it's hard to know what's being fixed, and your changes might regress in the future. Please consider adding tests to cover the change you're making. Including tests allows this PR to be merged by yourself and the owners of this module.

This can potentially save days of time for you!

[typescript-bot]

🔔 @mnahkies @abreits @nfantone @nickzelei @XVincentX @seonggwonyoon — please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

[typescript-bot]

Re-ping @abreits, @nfantone, @nickzelei, @XVincentX, @seonggwonyoon:

This PR has been out for over a week, yet I haven't seen any reviews.

Could someone please give it some attention? Thanks!

[typescript-bot]

⏳ Hi @NinjaKinshasa,

It's been a few days since this PR was approved by mnahkies and we're waiting for a DT maintainer to give a review.

If you would like to short-circuit this wait, you can edit some of the test files in the package which verify how the .d.ts files work. This would allow the PR to be merged by you or the DT module owners after a re-review.

[XVincentX]

I can see a new definition here - but where is it used?

[NinjaKinshasa]

Hello everyone, sorry for late reply.
I am not familiar with open source. I know tests are missing but I don't really know what to test here.

[typescript-bot]

It has been more than two weeks and this PR still has no reviews.

I'll bump it to the DT maintainer queue. Thank you for your patience, @NinjaKinshasa.

(Ping @abreits, @nfantone, @nickzelei, @XVincentX, @seonggwonyoon.)

[typescript-bot]

@NinjaKinshasa: Everything looks good here. I am ready to merge this PR (at 6aea293) on your behalf whenever you think it's ready.

If you'd like that to happen, please post a comment saying:

Ready to merge

and I'll merge this PR almost instantly. Thanks for helping out! ❤️

(@mnahkies, @abreits, @nfantone, @nickzelei, @XVincentX, @seonggwonyoon: you can do this too.)

[typescript-bot]

Re-ping @NinjaKinshasa / @abreits, @nfantone, @nickzelei, @XVincentX, @seonggwonyoon:

This PR has been ready to merge for over a week, and I haven't seen any requests to merge it. I will close it on Jun 28th (in three weeks) if this doesn't happen.

(If there's no reason to avoid merging it, please do so. Otherwise, if it shouldn't be merged or if it needs more time, please close it or turn it into a draft.)