Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show real class name #75

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2014
Merged

Show real class name #75

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2014

Conversation

erikbgithub
Copy link

When someone is extending ConfigObj the String should show the actual class name as well.

e.g.:

>>> class MyConfigObj(ConfigObj):
...     pass
>>> o=MyConfigObj()
>>> o
MyConfigObj({})

instead of

>>> o
ConfigObj({})

When someone is extending ConfigObj the String should show the actual class name as well.

e.g.:

```
>> class MyConfigObj(ConfigObj):
...     pass
>> o=MyConfigObj()
>> o
MyConfigObj({})
```

instead of

```
>> o
ConfigObj({})
```
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling d7ddf28 on erikb85:master into d00c202 on DiffSK:master.

@EliAndrewC
Copy link
Member

This seems good to me - thanks a bunch for the pull request and for including such a handy code snippet in the description.

EliAndrewC added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2014
@EliAndrewC EliAndrewC merged commit f99f93b into DiffSK:master Nov 22, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants