-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Embroider #406
Embroider #406
Conversation
This is related with #403 but I took a different approach (since I'm not removing the re-exports). |
@alias-mac Thanks for this PR! I'm fine either way. Would you mind merging in the main branch and see what happens to the test suite? |
@snewcomer rebased and ran the tests locally and they pass, but they are failing in CI. I was able to reproduce it when I run it with Based on embroider's changelog it seems that IE11 is supported. I'll try to take a stab at it and see what might be needed to get this fixed, but open to ideas. |
Ember addons benefit on using this addon provided by embroider directly. Read more information about it here: https://github.com/embroider-build/embroider/tree/master/packages/test-setup
The helpers re-exported in `app/` are expecting these to be defined.
@snewcomer I synced with @rwjblue and he pointed me in the right direction on what was needed to make this pass. Let me know what are the next steps to get this in. Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Woop woop!
@snewcomer any chance for a release with this one? |
Changes proposed in this pull request
Use @embroider/test-setup
Ember addons benefit on using this addon provided by embroider directly.
Read more information about it here.
Fix warnings provided by embroider build:
While running
ember try:one embroider-safe
orember try:one embroider-optimized
you will see warnings during the build:The ones related with this addon are fixed (in the second commit).
I had to rename
keys
toentries
to match the expectation inapp/
re-export, but this can be considered a breaking change, so perhaps it will be better to change the re-export to bekeys
instead ofentries
, although that breaks the convention from the other re-exports. Open to suggestions on how you want to proceed here.