Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Brock/merge 6.3.7 #1490

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023
Merged

Brock/merge 6.3.7 #1490

merged 10 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

brockallen
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

AndersAbel and others added 8 commits December 11, 2023 12:56
Demonstrates that the back channel logout service will create tokens
with a bad issuer if it is missing from the logout request
Moved the fix from IdentityServerTools into the back channel logout
service to avoid breaking changes in IdentityServerTools. While
technically this is a breaking change in the back channel service too,
this makes the impact much smaller, and more likely to be caught by the
compiler. The previous implementation changed the semantics of a string
parameter in a way that could have been surprising, vs this way adds a
new constructor parameter in a way that will be totally obvious and
caught by the compiler.
…ssuer

Fix logout token iss when issuer is missing
# Conflicts:
#	src/IdentityServer/IdentityServerTools.cs
#	src/IdentityServer/Validation/Default/JwtBearerClientAssertionSecretParser.cs
@brockallen
Copy link
Member Author

@josephdecock Here's the PR to merge the patch back into main. Can you have a review and also do any cleanup that's needed (like the open TODO). Thx

@brockallen brockallen added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Dec 15, 2023
@brockallen brockallen marked this pull request as ready for review December 15, 2023 14:56
Copy link
Member

@josephdecock josephdecock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I want to revisit the use of the service provider...

@josephdecock
Copy link
Member

Actually, I want to revisit the use of the service provider...

On second thought, the service provider should be done on its own. This is good merge.

@josephdecock josephdecock merged commit f02da33 into main Dec 15, 2023
5 checks passed
@josephdecock josephdecock deleted the brock/merge-6.3.7 branch December 15, 2023 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants