Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CheckV - prophages fixes and post processing gff creation step #80

Merged
merged 14 commits into from Jan 5, 2023

Conversation

mberacochea
Copy link
Member

@mberacochea mberacochea commented Nov 25, 2022

This PR includes:

  • A fix for prophages and chechV
  • GFF generation step

@mberacochea mberacochea marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2022 22:23
@mberacochea mberacochea self-assigned this Nov 25, 2022
Revert basics container.
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ process {

withLabel: plot_contig_map {container = 'microbiomeinformatics/emg-viral-pipeline-plot-contig-map:v1' }
withLabel: virfinder { container = 'microbiomeinformatics/virfinder:v1.1__eb8032e' }
withLabel: checkV { container = 'microbiomeinformatics/checkv:v0.8.1' }
withLabel: checkV { container = 'microbiomeinformatics/checkv:v0.8.1__1' }
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just a recommendation: for such cases you could also, in general, add an md5 checksum to the container name. E.g. the first 5 characters of the md5 sum of the Dockerfile.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Captured in #85

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ LABEL software.version="0.8.1"
ENV VERSION 0.8.1
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we could also bump all tool versions at some point. E.g. checkv is at 1.0.1 already. Not necessarily now, but maybe in another update

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Captured in #86

Copy link
Collaborator

@hoelzer hoelzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks all good! I also did some test run! From my side +1 for merging. Will also check the PR #81 now

@mberacochea
Copy link
Member Author

This also closes #77

@mberacochea mberacochea merged commit b420578 into dev Jan 5, 2023
@mberacochea mberacochea deleted the feature/post-processing-gff branch January 5, 2023 10:54
@mberacochea mberacochea restored the feature/post-processing-gff branch January 5, 2023 11:15
@mberacochea mberacochea deleted the feature/post-processing-gff branch January 5, 2023 11:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants