Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make it possible to choose an alternate completing reader #90

Open
maw opened this issue Nov 21, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Make it possible to choose an alternate completing reader #90

maw opened this issue Nov 21, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@maw
Copy link
Contributor

maw commented Nov 21, 2020

I would like to be able to use ivy-read with zetteldeft without turning ivy-mode on universally.

What I have in mind is something similar in spirit to saying:

(setq projectile-completion-system 'ivy)

I have some changes that mostly achieve this. I'll submit a PR with them soon.
@maw maw mentioned this issue Nov 21, 2020
Open
@EFLS
Copy link
Owner

EFLS commented Nov 23, 2020

That makes sense. I guess this could also address #27?

@EFLS EFLS added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 23, 2020
maw added a commit to maw/zetteldeft that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2022
@maw
Set default value of customizable function correctly
3a3fab6 
ref EFLS#90
maw added a commit to maw/zetteldeft that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2022
@maw
Call customized function correctly
7a07696 
ref EFLS#90
maw added a commit to maw/zetteldeft that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2022
@maw
Set default value of customizable function correctly
38b3e52 
ref EFLS#90
maw added a commit to maw/zetteldeft that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2022
@maw
Call customized function correctly
0c3f322 
ref EFLS#90
maw added a commit to maw/zetteldeft that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2022
@maw
Set default value of customizable function correctly
e9f343b 
ref EFLS#90
maw added a commit to maw/zetteldeft that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2022
@maw
Call customized function correctly
3305fa3 
ref EFLS#90
@maw
Copy link
Contributor Author

maw commented Jul 26, 2022

That makes sense. I guess this could also address #27?

Yes, I think this would help there too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@maw @EFLS