Neos jp character fix

[Earthmark]

The fix for the character as defined in Neos-Metaverse/NeosPublic#621 , this PR can be used to test the fix.

[Earthmark]

Thank you for the warning, I'll update the base PR to not do the distance check. Right now the scanline check does appear to be needed, as there's another glyph that has issues without that pass.

The goal right now is to update and correct the problematic character without regressions. In this case I think even if the end quality is slightly lower, not breaking any existing characters is slightly more important.

If it helps, this is the character that currently seems to require scanline correction to fix, it's a u from the wizzta font:

{
	21, 2.63247871399;
		c(19.8034210205, 1.19658124447);
	18.6068382263, 0.538461565971;
		c(17.5897426605, -0.0598290637136);
	16.3333339691, 0.0598290637136;
		c(15.0769233704, 0.17948718369);
	14.0598297119, 1.97435891628;
		m(12.6837615967, 1.19658124447);
	11.1282052994, 0.658119678497;
		m(9.63247966766, 0.119658127427);
	8.1367521286, 0.0598290637136;
		m(6.64102602005, 0);
	5.26495742798, 0.538461565971;
		m(3.88888907433, 1.13675224781);
	2.93162417412, 2.57264971733;
		m(2.27350449562, 3.52991485596);
	2.09401702881, 4.90598297119;
		m(1.91453003883, 6.28205156326);
	1.91453003883, 7.77777814865;
		m(1.97435891628, 9.33333301544);
	2.03418803215, 10.8290605545;
		m(2.15384626389, 12.3846158981);
	2.09401702881, 13.6410264969;
		m(2.09401702881, 14.897436142);
	1.7948718071, 15.6752147675;
		m(1.55555558205, 16.5128211975);
	0.777777791023, 16.6324806213;
		y(0.71794873476, 16.6324806213);
	0.35897436738, 16.7521362305;
		y;
	0, 16.8717956543;
		c(3.05128216743, 18.7863254547);
	4.54700899124, 18.1282043457;
		c(6.10256433487, 17.4700870514);
	6.16239356995, 13.8803424835;
		c(6.16239356995, 12.6239318848);
	6.10256433487, 11.0683765411;
		c(6.04273509979, 9.57264995575);
	6.04273509979, 8.07692337036;
		c(6.10256433487, 6.58119678497);
	6.40171003342, 5.32478618622;
		c(6.70085477829, 4.0683760643);
	7.4786324501, 3.41025662422;
		c(8.25641059875, 2.75213694572);
	9.63247966766, 2.93162417412;
		c(11.0683765411, 3.11111116409);
	13.3418807983, 4.42735052109;
		m;
	13.3418807983, 12.5042734146;
		m(13.2222232819, 14.4188041687);
	12.8034200668, 15.5555562973;
		m(12.3846158981, 16.7521362305);
	10.6495723724, 16.7521362305;
		y(11.6068382263, 17.5897426605);
	12.2051286697, 17.9487190247;
		y(12.8034200668, 18.3076934814);
	13.5213680267, 18.367521286;
		y(15.3760681152, 18.4273529053);
	16.1538467407, 17.3504276276;
		y(16.9316253662, 16.3333339691);
	17.1111125946, 14.7179489136;
		y(17.3504276276, 13.1025648117);
	17.1709403992, 11.1880340576;
		y(17.0512828827, 9.33333301544);
	17.0512828827, 7.77777814865;
		y(17.0512828827, 5.08547019958);
	17.6495742798, 3.88888907433;
		y(18.2478637695, 2.75213694572);
	19.025642395, 2.4529914856;
		y(19.8632488251, 2.09401702881);
	21, 2.4529914856;
		m;
	#
}

[Earthmark]

I'm going to merge this into the neos version update, Kazu has also verified this and I've yet to see novel artifacts in fonts I've seen used.