You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The discussion revolves around a TypeScript code issue encountered after updating to version 3.0. The original code snippet provided by the first user attempts to define a function taggedStruct that uses generics and the pipe method to attach a property signature to a struct. However, this approach no longer works after the update.
The second user, gcanti, suggests an alternative approach that bypasses the problem by directly calling S.attachPropertySignature(S.Struct(fields), "_tag", name) instead of using the pipe method. This solution appears to resolve the issue at hand.
gcanti further identifies the root cause of the problem as an excessive constraint A extends object that is only present in the pipeable version of attachPropertySignature. They propose to address this issue by submitting a pull request (PR) to the relevant codebase.
Key Takeaways:
The update to version 3.0 introduced a breaking change affecting the use of pipe with attachPropertySignature.
A workaround involves directly calling attachPropertySignature with its arguments instead of using the pipe method.
The underlying issue was identified as an excessive type constraint in the pipeable version of attachPropertySignature.
A proactive approach to resolving the issue involves contributing a fix through a pull request to the library's repository.
Summary
The discussion revolves around a TypeScript code issue encountered after updating to version 3.0. The original code snippet provided by the first user attempts to define a function
taggedStruct
that uses generics and thepipe
method to attach a property signature to a struct. However, this approach no longer works after the update.The second user,
gcanti
, suggests an alternative approach that bypasses the problem by directly callingS.attachPropertySignature(S.Struct(fields), "_tag", name)
instead of using thepipe
method. This solution appears to resolve the issue at hand.gcanti
further identifies the root cause of the problem as an excessive constraintA extends object
that is only present in the pipeable version ofattachPropertySignature
. They propose to address this issue by submitting a pull request (PR) to the relevant codebase.Key Takeaways:
pipe
withattachPropertySignature
.attachPropertySignature
with its arguments instead of using thepipe
method.attachPropertySignature
.Discord thread
https://discord.com/channels/795981131316985866/1231733088695091252
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: