Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[core] Add items helper #263

Merged

Conversation

ingwinlu
Copy link
Contributor

@ingwinlu ingwinlu commented Jul 6, 2022

Allows for easy access to sequential data for example when trying
to access data stored in CONTENT_SEQUENCE tags commonly used in
SR files.

Allows for easy access to sequential data for example when trying
to access data stored in CONTENT_SEQUENCE tags commonly used in
SR files.
Copy link
Owner

@Enet4 Enet4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the nice suggestion! We can bring it in after addressing the concerns inline.

core/src/header.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
core/src/header.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ingwinlu and others added 2 commits July 6, 2022 21:18
Co-authored-by: Eduardo Pinho <enet4mikeenet@gmail.com>
@ingwinlu
Copy link
Contributor Author

ingwinlu commented Jul 6, 2022

adjusted the helper to be called "items"

@ingwinlu ingwinlu changed the title Add to_items helper Add items helper Jul 8, 2022
Copy link
Owner

@Enet4 Enet4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All right, all is in order. Thank you!

@Enet4 Enet4 merged commit e527731 into Enet4:master Jul 9, 2022
@ingwinlu ingwinlu deleted the core/feature/add-dataelement-to-items-helper branch July 10, 2022 05:25
@Enet4 Enet4 changed the title Add items helper [core] Add items helper Jul 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants