Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactored operators into separate classes to simplify TPOT class and future incorporation of new operators #63

Closed
wants to merge 43 commits into from

Conversation

dmarx
Copy link

@dmarx dmarx commented Dec 22, 2015

Resolves issue #43,

  • Still needs significant documentation.
  • Also needs new testing suite.

davidmarx and others added 30 commits December 21, 2015 20:13
…All bugs not yet addressed, but saving work.
…t not actually be returning class assignments for some reason. Still, on the right track.
…tarting to figure this out. Also, add tpot/operators/operators_test.py which should have been added in previous commit.
…er model primitives to focus on the one model for development.
…mentally port each operator to the new object-oriented scheme.
…pected. Really need to sort out some unit tests for these operators.
… accept the input_DF (aka operator[2]) as a default input.
@rhiever
Copy link
Contributor

rhiever commented Dec 22, 2015

Thanks so much for this refactor! Since it'll require a fair amount of work to integrate, I'm going to hold off on merging this until mid-January or so when I'm done with the latest paper.

@rhiever
Copy link
Contributor

rhiever commented Feb 8, 2016

@dmarx: Okay, now is probably the best time to try to merge this before I move on to the next paper. You have bandwidth to try to link it with the current TPOT version?

@rhiever
Copy link
Contributor

rhiever commented Jul 18, 2016

Ideas from this refactor has been incorporated into #193. Thank you @dmarx!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants