FieldAccess with field types (Class<?>) #18
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
i also added a new content to readme.md file, on which i included an example on how to iterate all the fields by index. |
NathanSweet
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2013
FieldAccess with field types (Class<?>)
|
Thanks! In the future please don't include "added" comments, the added lines can be seen in the diff. I removed them after merging. :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I added a feature to keep the field type (Class<?>), and to get the field type by index.
I also added a method to return the field count, which is useful to directly iterate all the fields, and without the need to get the fieldnames array. This way, the FieldAccess implementation can change without changing the iteration interface, since the .get and .set can work with indexes.