exiv2.org problems due to the 0.28.0 release

[postscript-dev]

There are some minor fixes needed on https://exiv2.org after the 0.28.0 release.

Describe the bug

1. The manpage on https://exiv2.org/manpage.html is invalid. The PDF link displays https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/blob/0.28.x/man/man1/exiv2.1 instead of https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/blob/0.28.x/exiv2.md .
2. Missing 0.28.0 source download in https://exiv2.org/archive.html
3. In https://exiv2.org/download.html , the "Download Source" file is missing.
4. In https://exiv2.org/doc/examples.html , the exiv2json.cpp link doesn't work as the sample file was removed from the main branch.
5. The 0.28.0 changelog is missing from https://exiv2.org/changelog.html .
6. In https://exiv2.org/metadata.html , the tags are not listed in the various links (e.g. https://exiv2.org/tags-xmp-dc.html).

I haven't checked every link so it is possible that other problems may exist.

Additional context

There is a comment about the manpage that may be helpful (@nehaljwani )

When creating a significant release it is likely that small things will crop up. Hopefully these are simple to fix.

[nehaljwani]

Missing 0.28.0 source download in https://exiv2.org/archive.html

The archive page is for old releases only.

[nehaljwani]

In https://exiv2.org/download.html , the "Download Source" file is missing.

Fixed via Exiv2/team@82dbf8d

In https://exiv2.org/doc/examples.html , the exiv2json.cpp link doesn't work as the sample file was removed from the main branch.

Removed via Exiv2/team@31c9370

[postscript-dev]

@nehaljwani

Missing 0.28.0 source download in
https://exiv2.org/archive.html

The archive page is for old releases only

Yes, you're right. Thanks for checking

[postscript-dev]

@nehaljwani
I have just noticed one more thing. In https://exiv2.org/metadata.html , the tags are not listed in the various links (e.g. https://exiv2.org/tags-xmp-dc.html).

[nehaljwani]

The manpage on https://exiv2.org/manpage.html is invalid. The PDF link displays https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/blob/0.28.x/man/man1/exiv2.1 instead of https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/blob/0.28.x/exiv2.md .

Fixed via Exiv2/team@f496fc1 & Exiv2/team@4ba5e6f

[nehaljwani]

In https://exiv2.org/metadata.html , the tags are not listed in the various links

Fixed via Exiv2/team@b09d596

[clanmills]

Great Work, Everybody - especially @nehaljwani and @postscript-dev

I built 0.28 this morning on macOS. cmake cannot find Findinih.cmake

-- Could NOT find inih (missing: inih_LIBRARY inih_INCLUDE_DIR) 
CMake Error at cmake/Findinih.cmake:28 (message):
  inih library not found
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  cmake/findDependencies.cmake:80 (find_package)
  CMakeLists.txt:86 (include)

I successfully build with these commands:

$ cmake .. -DEXIV2_ENABLE_INIH=0 -DEXIV2_ENABLE_WEBREADY=1 -DEXIV2_ENABLE_CURL=1 
$ make
$ 

Can you remove my name and email address from the .MD files on 'main'. These files may be a little "stale" and I'm no longer in a position to answer questions from users.

808 rmills@rmillsm1:~/gnu/github/exiv2/main/b $ grep robin ../*.md
../README-CONAN.md:Written by Robin Mills<br>robin@clanmills.com<br>Updated: 2021-12-17
../README-SAMPLES.md:robin@clanmills.com<br>
../README.md:Written by Robin Mills<br>robin@clanmills.com<br>Updated: 2022-02-22
809 rmills@rmillsm1:~/gnu/github/exiv2/main/b $ 

[nehaljwani]

The 0.28.0 changelog is missing from https://exiv2.org/changelog.html .

Fixed via Exiv2/team@0a7b0ac

[luzpaz]

What's left here ?

[kmilos]

@nehaljwani @kevinbackhouse I guess all of this needs updating again after yesterday's 0.28.1 release? See also #2821

[eclipseo]

could we also have the list of breaking change from 0.28.0?

[kevinbackhouse]

@nehaljwani @kevinbackhouse I guess all of this needs updating again after yesterday's 0.28.1 release? See also #2821

I've made an attempt at it here: Exiv2/team#4

I see that the repo has a workflow file, so I'm hoping that the website will get updated automatically.

[kevinbackhouse]

could we also have the list of breaking change from 0.28.0?

None as far I know. All the backwards-incompatible changes happened between 0.27 and 0.28.

[eclipseo]

could we also have the list of breaking change from 0.28.0?

None as far I know. All the backwards-incompatible changes happened between 0.27 and 0.28.

yes that what I meant.