Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Workspace switcher search bar is in the wrong place. #41158

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 commented Apr 27, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #40826
PROPOSAL: #40826 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open workspace switcher page and verify the layout matches the designs linked below
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Open workspace switcher page and verify the layout matches the designs linked below

QA Steps

  1. Open workspace switcher page and verify the layout matches the designs linked below
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android_native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_chrome.mp4
iOS: Native
ios_native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web_chrome.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
desktop_app.mp4

324979395-7cd9d958-2536-4cb2-8414-a2c1925e5f1d

Signed-off-by: Krishna Gupta <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 27, 2024 23:46
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from getusha and removed request for a team April 27, 2024 23:46
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 27, 2024

@getusha Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

After fix:

Everything Selected Workspace Selected
everything_selected workspace_selected

cc: @Expensify/design

Signed-off-by: Krishna Gupta <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

In the design the input placeholder is Find a workspace and there is a search icon on the left of the input, do we need that as well?

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented May 1, 2024

@Expensify/design could you please confirm if this is looking as expected? thanks!

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm if we do want to add the icon, I would say we should add it to the right side of the input. Can you try that and show us what it looks like?

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented May 3, 2024

@Krishna2323 any updates?

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

Krishna2323 commented May 4, 2024

can you try that and show us what it looks like?

@shawnborton @getusha, IMO, we shouldn't add this because no other input in the app has this icon, or if we want, we can add this as default for every selection list input.

search_icon_right

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

IMO, we shouldn't add this because no other input in the app has this icon, or if we want, we can add this as default for every selection list input.

I actually don't mind the idea of making it so that every search box above a selection list uses that same style, which has the magnifying glass. What do you think @Expensify/design ? The alternative is to just omit the Search icon entirely, but I do think the icon helps this particular component look more like a search box and less like a heading.

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

I actually don't mind the idea of making it so that every search box above a selection list uses that same style, which has the magnifying glass.

Yeah I don't think that's a bad idea at all. At the same time, the right side in this workspace switcher is looking a little crazy, so I could be persuaded to drop the icon as well. I'll be happy with whatever you and @dubielzyk-expensify think is best!

CleanShot 2024-05-06 at 08 31 24@2x

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

True, but that's a good point - maybe we just need the search icon to be properly aligned all the way to the right side of the input. @Krishna2323 can you try that please?

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dannymcclain @shawnborton, currently the search icon has 8px padding right, if we remove the padding right from the icon it will still not look aligned with above 2 icons, so I reduced it to 4px instead.

Padding right 4px

workspace_switcher_icon_right

No Padding

workspace_switcher_icon_right_no_padding

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm that feels like a strange exception to make though, because we can't always guarantee these kinds of inputs will be in the same view as those kinds of list items. So I think I would prefer we just drop the icon altogether if that's the case.

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm that feels like a strange exception to make though, because we can't always guarantee these kinds of inputs will be in the same view as those kinds of list items. So I think I would prefer we just drop the icon altogether if that's the case.

Yeah same.

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Feels like you landed in a good place by dropping it. Makes sense to me 👍

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@getusha, I think we don't want to make any changes here, can you pls start reviewing.

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented May 7, 2024

I think we missed a case, we should include the Everything option to be selectable using a keyboard

Screen.Recording.2024-05-07.at.9.46.49.in.the.morning.mov

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

Krishna2323 commented May 7, 2024

@getusha, including the Everything option as a selectable using keyboard will be tricky, can we pls confirm if that is required.

cc: @shawnborton @rlinoz

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Personally I don't think Everything would be selected via keyboard just by using the arrows keys in the list. I would expect to have to tab up to it. Just my 2 cents.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Yup, I agree with that

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dannymcclain @shawnborton thanks!

@getusha, you can continue the review.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@getusha, bump for review.

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented May 12, 2024

BUG: the search input is blurred after opening the workspace switcher

Screen.Recording.2024-05-12.at.12.34.14.in.the.afternoon.mov

</View>
<UserListItem
item={defaultPolicy}
isFocused={activeWorkspaceID === undefined}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is causing #41158 (comment)
not sure why

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will check this today.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@getusha, this is fixed now, the input was getting blurred because the UserListItem was focused after input, I passed shouldSyncFocus={false} to UserListItem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants